Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   My daily mini-step performance (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=340565)

Skip Brutale 09-22-2005 06:37 PM

My Step 5 Performance
 
My roomate was still home today when I woke up so I decided to enter a step 2 that I had a freeroll for. I finished a dissapointing 6th, which looped me back to step 1.

After he left for work it was time; I let the dog out, got some water, locked the door, and entered a step 5. The players directly to my left and right seemed very agressive and somewhat loose so I wound up having to fold a few hands early and this got my chip stack down in the 800's before I adjusted.

A blind steal during 25/50 and a blind defense with QJs brought me back up around 1000. During 50/100 I believe we were 7 handed and I had 900'ish chips and moved in from MP2 with QKs, I was called by the button with AKs but I was able to flop a straight.

Going into the tournament I felt like the step 5 players are probably as good as me if not better so I will probably need to get lucky to do anything. But I also feel that I play well enough that if I get lucky once I can compete for 1st.

Well I felt more confident after this, not just because my stack doubled, but because I'd gotten lucky and felt like I could really compete now. I started getting a couple A's short-handed, a few of my my steals were called but I bluffed the flops and took them all down.

Pretty soon we were 5-handed, then 4-handed, then 3-handed. I had a bad feeling 3-handed like I would finish 3rd. I was lowest on chips and felt confident in my playing ability but just felt bad, like how I felt good about my chances of finishing nicely after the QK hand.

2nd had about 1500 more than me, and the chip leader pushed from his sb when I had A8 in my bb. I felt like if I start folding Aces with mid-kickers I'm just going to get grinded down and I wasnt ready to submit yet.

I called and was dissapointed when he showed 44. As I kind of anticipated, no help came and I finished in 3rd, good for 500 dollars. I seriously needed this money. I dont have a job and only have 80 dollars in my bank account outside of the 100 I have in online poker. I wouldnt have been able to make my rent or car payments without this.

I was of course dissapointed to lose a coinflip there. You always feel like if you win that and double up, become the chip leader, you can work the bubble and everything and finish 1st. 2000 would have been real nice. But I did win with a dominated hand earlier so I cant complain about losing a coinflip. Also the fact that I entered the step 1 3 days ago makes the step 5 seem less big and important to me than if I was working for a long time to reach it.

Well Im very happy with the results of my step 5, I feel like I can play just as well as most of the guys at that level and hope my step 1 freeroll will send me back there again soon.

Scuba Chuck 09-22-2005 10:11 PM

Re: My Step 5 Performance
 
skip, I think many here would be interested to hear more about the level of competition, and the difference in style of play at the mini-step table.

Also, how many sharks did you sense were at the table vs the common folk?

Skip Brutale 09-23-2005 12:09 AM

Re: My Step 5 Performance
 
[ QUOTE ]
skip, I think many here would be interested to hear more about the level of competition, and the difference in style of play at the mini-step table.

Also, how many sharks did you sense were at the table vs the common folk?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well I noticed at step 4 and 5 you see alot of mini-raising. Its kind of strange because mini-raising comes from people who suck at the low levels, and people who are good at the higher ones. I dont do it, but alot of people do.

Everyone is just pretty solid at step 5. The guys I thought were too loose or too agressive were still very dangerous and far from donators. As for the shark aspect, given the prize structure payout (5th and 4th getting less than the entry fee) I'm not sure how many people would be tempted to buy directly in. I think most people probably won their way there, but they had to at least be decent to do that.

Skip Brutale 09-23-2005 12:11 AM

Re: My Step 5 Performance
 
I played that step 1 I qualified for today. While 3-handed the chip leader seemed to get disconnected, I called a push with A8 and my opponent showed JJ but I hit aces to cripple him.

I went ahead and entered the step 2 and got a real cold stretch of cards, forcing me to finish on the bubble in 3rd. Also we went into 50/100 without a single player knocked out, pretty crazy for step 2.

se2schul 09-23-2005 09:05 AM

Re: My Step 5 Performance
 
[ QUOTE ]
I seriously needed this money. I dont have a job and only have 80 dollars in my bank account outside of the 100 I have in online poker. I wouldnt have been able to make my rent or car payments without this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe it's just me, but this sounds exceedingly irresponsible. I'd get a crappy job at McDonalds to ensure that I could pay the bills and then play poker at a level that couldn't lead to my financial ruin, yet still supplement my income from a crappy job.

Good luck.

Scuba Chuck 09-23-2005 06:29 PM

Re: My Step 5 Performance
 
[ QUOTE ]
As for the shark aspect, given the prize structure payout (5th and 4th getting less than the entry fee) I'm not sure how many people would be tempted to buy directly in. I think most people probably won their way there, but they had to at least be decent to do that.


[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty certain this information is incorrect. And I hope you can see why.

09-23-2005 06:32 PM

Re: My daily mini-step performance
 
good for you

Skip Brutale 09-24-2005 04:25 AM

Re: My Step 5 Performance
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As for the shark aspect, given the prize structure payout (5th and 4th getting less than the entry fee) I'm not sure how many people would be tempted to buy directly in. I think most people probably won their way there, but they had to at least be decent to do that.


[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty certain this information is incorrect. And I hope you can see why.

[/ QUOTE ]

If I saw why, then I'd be holding a different opinion wouldnt I. Do you see why?

Now if you want to enlighten me instead of posting vague rude responses be my guest (dont bother if you are going to tell me their roi is high enough vs. step 5 "fish" to make up for the friendly payout structure).

kong98 09-24-2005 01:59 PM

Re: My Step 5 Performance
 
[ QUOTE ]
If I saw why, then I'd be holding a different opinion wouldnt I. Do you see why?

[/ QUOTE ]

nh [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

09-24-2005 02:47 PM

Re: My Step 5 Performance
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If I saw why, then I'd be holding a different opinion wouldnt I. Do you see why?

[/ QUOTE ]

nh [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

That was a pretty good comeback.

Skip, scuba is trying to say that many of the people you played against did directly buy-in. It's widely known that the steps are a waste of time, the only way for them to be profitable is to buy-in directly or into step 4. So for you to make it all the way up the ladder is pretty impressive. If you watch some of the step 5's (mini and normal) you'll see alot of the same faces.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.