Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   pure bluff 5/10 (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=325019)

TheWorstPlayer 08-29-2005 04:41 PM

Re: pure bluff 5/10
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How would you play 99 here? Same way, no?

[/ QUOTE ]

i would fold

fim

[/ QUOTE ]
You would fold 99 on a J55 board against a LAG? I don't get it.

LethalRose 08-29-2005 04:44 PM

Re: pure bluff 5/10
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How would you play 99 here? Same way, no?

[/ QUOTE ]

i would fold

fim

[/ QUOTE ]
You would fold 99 on a J55 board against a LAG? I don't get it.

[/ QUOTE ]

A bet by a lag and then a call by a tight player I think 99 here is a fold.

TheWorstPlayer 08-29-2005 04:45 PM

Re: pure bluff 5/10
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How would you play 99 here? Same way, no?

[/ QUOTE ]

i would fold

fim

[/ QUOTE ]
You would fold 99 on a J55 board against a LAG? I don't get it.

[/ QUOTE ]

A bet by a lag and then a call by a tight player I think 99 here is a fold.

[/ QUOTE ]
Forgot the call. Thank you.

fimbulwinter 08-29-2005 05:01 PM

Re: pure bluff 5/10
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How would you play 99 here? Same way, no?

[/ QUOTE ]

i would fold

fim

[/ QUOTE ]
You would fold 99 on a J55 board against a LAG? I don't get it.

[/ QUOTE ]

A bet by a lag and then a call by a tight player I think 99 here is a fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

you're right, however that does not mean that im not folding the best hand the majority of the time...

fim

AZK 08-29-2005 05:46 PM

Re: pure bluff 5/10
 
whats the diff btwn 99 and 'purebluff', that was my point

NLfool 08-29-2005 05:52 PM

Re: pure bluff 5/10
 
J55r looks a bit too weird to me. No straight draw no flush draw, seems odd to play trip 5's so fast.

fimbulwinter 08-29-2005 05:54 PM

Re: pure bluff 5/10
 
[ QUOTE ]
whats the diff btwn 99 and 'purebluff', that was my point

[/ QUOTE ]

well, ok. this is not my default line in either case. my default is to not go apetit out of position. i might call with 99 here and hope that overstates my hand enough to get a cheap showdown against a bluff and a delayed bluff (and maybe even peel a 9). that line is not applicable ever wth 67.

basically i feel it is my right to win more than my fair share of pots cos my mother thinks imspecial.
fim

creedofhubris 08-29-2005 06:09 PM

Re: pure bluff 5/10
 
[ QUOTE ]
This is exactly why you need to use this move when you do flop big as well. I love reraising or checkraising a pf raiser on 55j board when I have 65 - they always think you're full of [censored]. So, in your hand, I would only do this if they know you will sometimes play a flopped monster this way.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree entirely with this assessment.

fimbulwinter 08-29-2005 06:31 PM

Re: pure bluff 5/10
 
[ QUOTE ]
J55r looks a bit too weird to me. No straight draw no flush draw, seems odd to play trip 5's so fast.

[/ QUOTE ]

hmmmm, how to answer this one. ok ,if i have 555 on this flop there are few cards likely to help my opponents but those that do will result in me losing a very substantial pot.

fim

Jason Strasser 08-30-2005 01:47 AM

Re: pure bluff 5/10
 
Make it closer to 400 with both ur good hands and [censored].


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.