Re: Redefining \"Cold-Decked\"
 

[ QUOTE ]
So, I figured out what my hand distribution should have been (20 for pairs, 55 for offsuiteds and 14 for suiteds)

[/ QUOTE ]
This number doesn't seem right to me. Is it not once in every 111 hands that you have get a certain offsuited hand? That would make it 40.5 for offsuiteds in 4500 and the your numbers for offsuited would not be far off from the average distribution.

The ratio between offsuited and suited should be 3:1, in your numbers this ratio is 4:1 so it seems the suited hands have been counted twice.

Re: Redefining \"Cold-Decked\"
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I have run at V$IP 12 PFR 8 for quite a few sessions of 600-800 hands. Worse is running Won$atSD<45% for 1,000 hand stretches. I know which I prefer.

[/ QUOTE ]

After last night, about 1k hands, of 35% W$SD, I will definitely say I'd rather have the low VP$IP. Saves a lot of money, but is rather boring/tedious, but better than having second best time and time again.....

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. I ran 36% W$SD at 2/4 full ring last night. Low VPIP is much much better.

Re: Redefining \"Cold-Decked\"
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I have run at V$IP 12 PFR 8 for quite a few sessions of 600-800 hands. Worse is running Won$atSD<45% for 1,000 hand stretches. I know which I prefer.

[/ QUOTE ]

After last night, about 1k hands, of 35% W$SD, I will definitely say I'd rather have the low VP$IP. Saves a lot of money, but is rather boring/tedious, but better than having second best time and time again.....

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. I ran 36% W$SD at 2/4 full ring last night. Low VPIP is much much better.

[/ QUOTE ]


I beat you all! My WSD for one session of 1.3K hands was 23. The next day I had a WSD of 84 to make up for it though :-)

Re: Redefining \"Cold-Decked\"
 

[ QUOTE ]
The ratio between offsuited and suited should be 3:1, in your numbers this ratio is 4:1 so it seems the suited hands have been counted twice.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I did 8/52 * 4 /51, so now I'm even more perplexed how I lost so much VP$IP [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Scott