Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Internet Gambling (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Phil Ivey prop bet (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=292582)

mackthefork 07-14-2005 08:54 AM

Re: Phil Ivey prop bet
 
WTF does all that crap mean anyway, why can't they just say Evens 5/4 6/4 7/4 2/1 5/2 etc like a normal human being might. Blah yuck

Mack

meow_meow 07-14-2005 08:59 AM

Re: Phil Ivey prop bet
 
[ QUOTE ]
WTF does all that crap mean anyway, why can't they just say Evens 5/4 6/4 7/4 2/1 5/2 etc like a normal human being might. Blah yuck

Mack

[/ QUOTE ]

There are many ways to quote odds.
Live with it.

mackthefork 07-14-2005 09:23 AM

Re: Phil Ivey prop bet
 
[ QUOTE ]
There are many ways to quote odds.
Live with it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good reasoning, heres a good reason for having a universal system.

thin analogy drawn by mack

Regards Mack

allinbaby 07-14-2005 09:25 AM

Re: Phil Ivey prop bet
 
The pinnacle line has now shifted enough that those of you who took the field at -181 can bet on the Big Three to make a safe profit.

meow_meow 07-14-2005 09:36 AM

Re: Phil Ivey prop bet
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There are many ways to quote odds.
Live with it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good reasoning, heres a good reason for having a universal system.

thin analogy drawn by mack

Regards Mack

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah ha!
Maybe it's just the reverse though - having different convensions confuses the punters into making bad bets [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Morpheus 07-14-2005 09:48 AM

Re: Phil Ivey prop bet
 
I took the Big 3.

allinbaby 07-14-2005 10:41 AM

Re: Phil Ivey prop bet
 
[ QUOTE ]
So with Big 3 getting +196 for this to be a +EV bet, you'd have to think that those 3 guys are better than 50 % to win the WSOP. If not, then you go with the field. Man, I really don't know.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is it whether or not one of the Big 3 will win the event? I'd assumed it was the total prize money earned by the Big 3 vs the money won by the field.

Either way tho, I still see value at Field -210.

Morpheus 07-14-2005 11:24 AM

Re: Phil Ivey prop bet
 
I didn't choose the field because you have to win that bet 66 % of the time for it to be +EV. I still don't know and I don't think either bet is really that good. I don't wager on sports very often and the last time I did, it was on horse racing. Anyway, since it is -210 for the field, you are getting 1 to 2 . You have to win 2 times for every loss to break even.

BigBluffer 07-14-2005 01:04 PM

Pinnacle\'s Cashout Policy
 
Just thought I'd throw you guys a heads up in case you were thinking of opening an account and throwing a tenner on one of these props. Here's a copy and paste job from their web site:

Our clients receive one free payout per month for withdrawals of $1,000 or more for cheques or wire transfers, with a flat fee of $25, or equivalent, for any additional withdrawals. Clients also receive one free Neteller, Moneybookers, WebMoney or Instadebit withdrawal of $500 or more per calendar month. Neteller, Moneybookers, WebMoney or Instadebit withdrawals of less than $500, or more than one per calendar month, incur a fee of $15 or equivalent, per transaction.

So, consider how this affects your EV computation on a small bankroll. I was gonna put $20 on the Big 3 just to have some rooting interest until I read this. The $15 withdrawal fee put the brakes on that. I guess I could just deposit $600 and then withdraw for free Saturday. Yeah, that might work.

Pokeraddict 07-14-2005 01:18 PM

Re: Pinnacle\'s Cashout Policy
 
Nice catch there. Most of these sportsbooks have gotten out of hand with cashout fees. As if the advantage they have on the bets isnt enough.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.