Re: Mr. Sklansky, Please Read
 

[ QUOTE ]
This could all be solved very simply. All it would take would be for the posters on this forum to a acknowledge and state, "David I now realize that the existence of any kind of personal God is highly unlikely. And if he does exist, he is most likely you".

That should happen soon enough and we can all get back to holdem strategy.

[/ QUOTE ]


David, I have always realized that the existence of any kind of personal God is highly unlikely. And if he does exist, he has made you a great poker player and theoretician. And a very decent human being. But nothing more than that.

That is a high compliment, not an insult, BTW.

Thank you for all your contributions to the world. You are not a god.

Re: Mr. Sklansky, Please Read
 

David I now realize that the existence of any kind of personal God is highly unlikely. And if he does exist, he is most likely you.

Now, is it really such a terrible thing that I simply muck without looking at my second card when my first card is a deuce?

Re: Mr. Sklansky, Please Read
 

My Flock is beginning to call me. But there are so many forums now. I think I will reside on the Poker Theory forum even if isn't exactly appropriate so people know where they can find me.

Some god !...
 

Can only make Bally's to run Hold'em Challenge !

[img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

Re: Mr. Sklansky, Please Read
 

David I now realize that the existence of any kind of personal God is highly unlikely. And if he does exist, boy is he going to be pissed.

SheetWise

Re: Mr. Sklansky, Please Read
 

I enjoyed this one, got me to laugh

Re: Mr. Sklansky, Please Read
 

David, I now realize that the existence of any kind of personal God is highly unlikely. And if he does exist, he is most likely you, despite your imperfect grammar.

Re: Mr. Sklansky, Please Read
 

David I now realize that the existence of any kind of personal God is highly unlikely. And if he does exist, he is most likely you.