Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   1st 10k of 6max (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=242147)

Lost Wages 04-29-2005 09:24 AM

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 
I can't see your stats but I now have a great celebrity screen saver and know how to impress women with my abs. TYVM.

Lost Wages

goodguy_1 04-29-2005 09:31 AM

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm with Krishan all the way on this one

[/ QUOTE ]
me too 10K is just too small.
Btw has Nikla ever posted his 6MAX stats on this forum?

topspinner 04-29-2005 10:14 AM

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 
I disagree, after 10,000 hands, I believe your stats (besides winrate) will not be significantly different than after 50,000 hands (if you don't change the way you play). If you are posting to find leaks in your game and not brag about your winrate, then I think you can discern some helpful information.

I posted my stats after 20,000 hands and a helpful poster was able to point out a couple of leaks in my game that I was not aware of. If you don't like the stats posts don't read them. Personally I like to see the stats posts and to see how the winrates, relate to the stats.

jph0424 04-29-2005 12:45 PM

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 
I didn't play any 1/2 6max before starting at 5/10. The reason is that I had plenty of bankroll from full ring games and felt comfortable enough adapting to a shorthanded game. I played one table for the first thousand or so hands and then played 2. I have been lurking here for over a year since I read TOP and HPFAP. I since have reread those multiple times and picked up a bunch of other 2+2 stuff. This site deserves a bunch of the credit for making me a winning player. When I posted those stats I really wasn't expecting so many positive responses because I figured I probably wasn't doing something optimally. Thanks for all the responses.

JP

RunDownHouse 04-29-2005 12:49 PM

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 
My entire post was centered on winrate. Other stats are a copmletely separate issue.

How can you reconcile your first sentence with your last?

sthief09 04-29-2005 12:51 PM

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 
[ QUOTE ]
Its a small sample but if your stats continue like that I think you should be able to maintain close to that winrate.

[/ QUOTE ]


lol

sthief09 04-29-2005 12:53 PM

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 
[ QUOTE ]
If his postflop play is good and he is valuebetting well I think he is definately somewhere between 3 and 4/100.


[/ QUOTE ]


lol

Ryno 04-29-2005 01:08 PM

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 
I was surprised by this stat (how often people are folding to you):

Steal success, Ww/oSD% = 54.56%.

For those with large databases, is this high or standard?

jph0424 04-29-2005 01:08 PM

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 
I did not make this post to brag about my win rate. I was just curious to see if my game had any obvious flaws that I could improve upon. I understand 10k is not a large enough sample to determine any kind of a winrate.

NLSoldier 04-29-2005 02:56 PM

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Its a small sample but if your stats continue like that I think you should be able to maintain close to that winrate.

[/ QUOTE ]


lol

[/ QUOTE ]


The guy just switched to 6max, and his stats are already at pretty optimal levels. If he's doing things wrong he is only going to get better from here. I don't see what its so hard to believe that he could be a 2.5BB/100 winner.

If someone had posted stats that were completely terrible with some amazing winrate (pokerpaul comes to mind) I would tell them their are a hot running n00b and about to crash and burn. But when somone posts good stats I think there is a good chance they are playing good poker.

Even if his winrate had been, say 0, I would still estimate based on his stats that he is going to be a big winner in that game.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.