Re: Typical Liberal Tolerance
 

[ QUOTE ]
WOW, wait till the effects of the kool-aid wears off, and then reread my post. The person voted for the anti-playboy party, why should playboy continue to pay them?


[/ QUOTE ]

So, you must also agree with all those churches out there who do not want to be forced to hire gays or other people who are openly in sin (by the employer church's standards). You certainly wouldn't be inconsistent in respect to whether an employer has the right to make employment decisions based on the beliefs of the employee.

Re: Typical Liberal Tolerance
 

typical conservative dementia. Churches are not required to hire gays, have never been required, and no one is trying to require it.

Re: Typical Liberal Tolerance
 

[ QUOTE ]
(when has drudge been wrong?)

[/ QUOTE ]Holy [censored].

Re: Typical Liberal Tolerance
 

[ QUOTE ]
The source makes it worth ignoring.

[/ QUOTE ]

Even if the facts are right in this case, the above statement is definitely true.

Re: Typical Liberal Tolerance
 

fine you idiots. how is this for a source??? its [censored] unbelievable how ignorant you libs are when you are proven yet again to be biggoted hypocrites.

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050308/nytu139_1.html

Re: Typical Liberal Tolerance
 

I wouldn't call it tolerant, but I think it is perfectly reasonable for a business to fire someone for voting for a party that wants to put them out of business. Another point: We have a secret ballot in this country, so if the editor of playgirl had been smart enough to keep her mouth shut, her emploayer would never have known how whe voted.

Re: Typical Liberal Tolerance
 

[ QUOTE ]
fine you idiots. how is this for a source??? its [censored] unbelievable how ignorant you libs are when you are proven yet again to be biggoted hypocrites.

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/050308/nytu139_1.html

[/ QUOTE ]


Huh?

I'm not a liberal. I just realize how horrible your originial source is. Nice choice of words, though.
How very mature of you. It's always funny how neo-cons like to lump all people who disagree with them into one group. I suppose that makes it easier for them.

Also, I hope you have a Merry Christmas.

Re: Typical Liberal Tolerance
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not a liberal.

[/ QUOTE ]

Socialist? Communist?

[ QUOTE ]
I just realize how horrible your originial source is.

[/ QUOTE ]

Saying something doesn't make it true. You have no basis to claim this. PROVE to me that Drudge is not a good source.

[ QUOTE ]
It's always funny how neo-cons like to lump all people who disagree with them into one group. I suppose that makes it easier for them.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's like the pot calling the kettle black isn't it? Liberals claim everyone is a neo-con. I am not a neo-con by the way, but nice try. Way to come through with supporting your position....

[ QUOTE ]
Also, I hope you have a Merry Christmas.

[/ QUOTE ]

And I hope you do as well.

Re: Typical Liberal Tolerance
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not a liberal.

[/ QUOTE ]

Socialist? Communist?

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this a joke?
I hope so, because I'm neither.
In fact, I'm more conservative than most 'Republicans'.
Nice try, though.

[ QUOTE ]
That's like the pot calling the kettle black isn't it? Liberals claim everyone is a neo-con. I am not a neo-con by the way, but nice try. Way to come through with supporting your position....

[/ QUOTE ]

What's my position, again? You'll have to tell me since you know so much more about me than I do. For your information, what you were quoting was my exceptional sarcasm.

What?

You didn't get it?

That's not surprising.

Take a pill and calm down. All I said was that Drudge is not a reliable source. OTHER PEOPLE have already mentioned why, and I'm not going to debate a fool about it.

You're obviously a bigger idiot than most on here.
If you can't see why, well... I'm not surprised.
I bet there's a whole lot you don't see.

Re: Typical Liberal Tolerance
 

AngryCola- a conservative? [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]