*RESULTS*
 

I am thinking that a check call is best here, but i was thinking the other day of a diablo (or maybe ulyessus then) where he was playing against the 'higher' NL players and he CR'd all in when the 3rd [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] hit on a low board w KKd.

can anyone drag that up for me?

the hand itself was pretty anticlimatic, as he checked the turn as well, then a Q hit the river and chk chk MHWG.

thanks,

fsuplayer

Re: *RESULTS*
 

[ QUOTE ]
I am thinking that a check call is best here, but i was thinking the other day of a diablo (or maybe ulyessus then) where he was playing against the 'higher' NL players and he CR'd all in when the 3rd [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] hit on a low board w KKd.

can anyone drag that up for me?

[/ QUOTE ]

If we're thinking of the same hand, it bears no similarity to the one that you played. Not that CR-ing is necessarily bad here.

If you check-call the turn, do you call another decent sized bet on the river?

And, depending on how frisky the guy is, I think the river might be a small value-bet. If he was gonna bluff at it, he probably would have taken his shot on the turn. When he checks there, it means he probably has showdown value.

ML4L

Re: *RESULTS*
 

how come you didn't bet the river?

Re: Passive Aggressive AA
 

I bet the pot on the turn. He moves you in, you've got a huge redraw if he's got you beat, not to mention the possibility that you have him crushed with a hand like K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] or whatever.

- C -

Re: *RESULTS*
 

[ QUOTE ]
how come you didn't bet the river?

[/ QUOTE ]

a combo of thinking he may have checked a flush, and that he might bet hands I beat.

but i dont like it. when i posted the hand, i thought that was a mistake, but wanted to see what others thought.

Re: *RESULTS*
 

yeah, this seems to me to be a situation where if you're going to call, you might as well bet, especially given the river card.