Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Internet Gambling (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   pokernow reload (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=148249)

mistrpug 11-12-2004 10:52 AM

Re: pokernow reload
 
[ QUOTE ]
Admittedly I am only a "novice flirt" in the bonus whoring hierarchy, but is 15% really that good? Seems kind of low . . .

[/ QUOTE ]

If you have a decent bankroll, it doesn't really matter, but yes, that is the lowest sites typically would go. 20-25% is much more common.

Izaak_Walton 11-12-2004 11:22 AM

Re: pokernow reload
 
Thank you.

Do all of the Party skins define "raked hands" identically, and is 8x a good deal?

moondogg 11-12-2004 11:31 AM

Re: pokernow reload
 
[ QUOTE ]

Do all of the Party skins define "raked hands" identically, and is 8x a good deal?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, at all Party skins, if you are dealt cards and rake is taken from the pot, it is a raked hand. No personal contribution to the pot is necessary.

8x is an OK deal. The best ones you get at Party skins are 5x (usually signup bonuses), but their reloads are usually 7x or 10x. This the first I've seen of 8x.

Spartacus 11-12-2004 11:54 AM

No Shark
 
I have been sending emails for a week to various places trying to get my 2nd $100 from the Shark bonus as well. Emails are either blown off or the response is typical Party doublespeak.

I just tried the email you listed in your post, jane....

Anyway I got the following failure delivery message,
[ QUOTE ]
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<jane@unlimitedblueskies.com>:
Sorry, I couldn't find any host named unlimitedblueskies.com. (#5.1.2)

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.



[/ QUOTE ]

She tired of hearing from us?

TylerD 11-12-2004 11:56 AM

Re: No Shark
 
I just got the second $100. Here is the address I got swift responses from: jane@blueskieslimited.com

moondogg 11-12-2004 11:56 AM

Re: No Shark
 
[ QUOTE ]
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<jane@unlimitedblueskies.com>:
Sorry, I couldn't find any host named unlimitedblueskies.com. (#5.1.2)

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.



[/ QUOTE ]

jane@blueskieslimited.com, not jane@unlimitedblueskies.com

busguy 11-12-2004 12:20 PM

Re: pokernow reload
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't see it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats because I don't think it IS up on their web-site yet. It was the affiliate who posted the link (in the original thread on this new re-load) so I think he was giving us a sneek preview so to speak.

[img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] busguy

Spartacus 11-12-2004 12:47 PM

Re: No Shark
 
Thanks guys. Actually being as lazy as I am, I cut and pasted from one of the posts.

It's all moot now anyway as I just received the bonus as 'Jane' responded to an email I sent the 8th.

Thanks though.....

Jeff P 11-12-2004 02:24 PM

Re: pokernow reload
 
Edit: Meant to reply to a different thread, moving post to that one.

sublime 11-13-2004 12:29 AM

Re: pokernow reload
 
bump

1/2 hour away


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.