Re: 10/20 Short vs. 15/30 Full
 

So I just voted in this poll and found that my answers are like opposite of what the leading vote-getters are.

There've been close to 40 people who have voted... Are there that many people who've seen this poll and have extensive experience in both games to be voting?!?

Anyone who I know that has logged a lot of hours in both games feel that 15/30 fulls DO produce more swings. My own play in both games says this as well.

Likewise, table selection is so, so, so much more important in 15/30 fulls it's ridiculous. Seriously, table selection requirements for 10/20 6m should almost always be "open seat." If you have good notes it's very easy to see when to not sit at a table, since there are so few TAGs and so many mediocre playing regulars. I think I avoid tables because they're bad like once in 20 times. At 15/30 there is a large enough collection of solid playing TAGs (thanks 2+2) that it becomes much more important to know who they are, since it's more likely you'll eventually end up seated with a bunch if you don't happen to know better.

Regarding profitability, I think it's close enough that either game works. The difference in stakes gets made up for by playing extra hands at 6max, as well as extra rakeback.

Re: 10/20 Short vs. 15/30 Full
 

[ QUOTE ]
Click on the pop up and use your mouse wheel or arrow keys to scroll.

[/ QUOTE ]

That didn't work for me, but once you have the pop-up up then you can hit <Ctrl><N> and it will open a new regular window in which you can see the full results.
[img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
B.

Re: 10/20 Short vs. 15/30 Full
 

[ QUOTE ]
So I just voted in this poll and found that my answers are like opposite of what the leading vote-getters are.


[/ QUOTE ]
Hey Schneids,

What's your opinion of a safe bankroll for 10/20 6-Max. 500 BB enough?

Benjamin - almost there. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Re: 10/20 Short vs. 15/30 Full
 

I voted 500BB for 10/206m and 750BB for 15/30 full. I actually think 600-650BB is good for 15/30 but that wasn't an option.

About the largest losing streaks that very good players I'm aware of have been on in 10/20 6m has been ~300BB, versus 15/30 that reaching upwards of 400BB.

However, yes, 500BB is about right for regularly playing 10/20 6m.

Re: 10/20 Short vs. 15/30 Full
 

[ QUOTE ]
You only get a pop-up which shows the results of the first two polls, the rest you cannot see or scroll to.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm able to resize the window under Firefox. Not sure about IE.

Re: 10/20 Short vs. 15/30 Full
 

Nope that does not work - I am using Netscape.

Had to view page info and copy the URL, then post this in a new window (<Ctrl><N> opens a blank page... [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]).

Re: 10/20 Short vs. 15/30 Full
 

[ QUOTE ]
Nope that does not work - I am using Netscape.

Had to view page info and copy the URL, then post this in a new window (<Ctrl><N> opens a blank page... [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]).

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL ... the first time I wanted to see it I looked at the html ... kind of hard to track it down in the code, but it does work. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

B.