Re: Winrate Threads
 

[ QUOTE ]
What's wrong with winrate threads?

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. There is usually something gained from them other than just a simple >3.5bb/100 rule.

I think if people posted winrate threads and there were only a couple of regulars posting comments such as "buzz off" or "wrong forum", or throwing up the AZK sign, then deleting would be warranted.

But of you look at many of the winrate threads, they are fairly long, so obviously something is being discussed.

I think as long as people put winrate in the subject, those who want to avoid them can.

Re: Winrate Threads
 

[ QUOTE ]
we need a sticky that says:

5-10NL: >3 good
>5 very good
10-20NL: >2 good
>3.5 very good

LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM
LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM
LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM
LONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLONGTERMLO NGTERM

[/ QUOTE ]

ptbb or bb?

Re: Winrate Threads
 

PT

you're not running at like 10PTBB in the 2k are you?

Re: Winrate Threads
 

stating the obvious

Re: Winrate Threads
 

good, just checking if anyone else was also.

Re: Winrate Threads
 

what i find interesting is how much easier it is to sustain higher winrates at 3/6 and 2/4 than these bigger games

Re: Winrate Threads
 

[ QUOTE ]
what i find interesting is how much easier it is to sustain higher winrates at 3/6 and 2/4 than these bigger games

[/ QUOTE ]

Why is this interesting, this is expected. PPL suck at my level, calling off with TPTK

Re: Winrate Threads
 

I hate the winrate threads.

Re: Winrate Threads
 

I hate these threads and they usually die on their own but im amazed on how long they last.

Re: Winrate Threads
 

[ QUOTE ]
PT

you're not running at like 10PTBB in the 2k are you?

[/ QUOTE ]

Excuse my ignorance but could you clarify that? I saw somewhere else that there is a difference but what exactly is the difference?