Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Huge vag. or well played? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=293066)

krishanleong 07-14-2005 11:13 PM

Re: Huge vag. or well played?
 
[ QUOTE ]
But would another 2+2er recognize this common WA/WB line and 3-bet with a lesser hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not usually.

Krishan

BottlesOf 07-14-2005 11:14 PM

Re: Huge vag. or well played?
 
Thanks, and I think you are right on all points.

sublime 07-14-2005 11:26 PM

Re: Huge vag. or well played?
 
sold out to the man huh?

imported_ncray 07-14-2005 11:27 PM

Re: Huge vag. or well played?
 
[ QUOTE ]
sold out to the man huh?

[/ QUOTE ]

[Stewie]How do you know about the man?[/Stewie]

Jonny Melon 07-14-2005 11:56 PM

Re: Huge vag. or well played?
 
This post got me thinking. Is it really correct to raise the river here? Would a 2+2er bet AK on the river, given how this played out? I'm thinking he would check.

If the 2+2er would check AK, then what we are (typically) looking at here are TT - AA, which truly is a coin flip. I think TT, JJ and the case QQ would pay off a raise. So the question of raising the river comes down to the likelihood that your opponent will 3-bet w/ KK or AA. If the answer is no, then a river raise is a nice play. If the answer is yes, then I think a call is order, because even a 1% chance of your opponent 3-betting a weaker hand swings it in favor of a call.

I suspect some part of my reasoning is flawed here; I would like to hear your opinions.

Jon

Ryno 07-15-2005 01:03 AM

Re: Huge vag. or well played?
 
"He's pretty good, a little passive maybe"

"I kinda like it. At least for metagame reasons. "

My initial reaction is that I would *not* want to call down flop-turn-river vs. a kinda passive player for (among other things) metagame reasons. What is the behavioral modification you are looking to induce?

baby-jesus 07-15-2005 01:21 AM

Re: Huge vag. or well played?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Raise the river.

Krishan

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure. At 10/20, this looks a lot like a scare card river bluff. Aren't AA & KK still 3 betting here knowing you didn't cap anything with a 7 PF? I hate folding to a 3 bet also, which is probably what you need to do. Although it sucks, I call down. I don't mind c/r the flop though.

Subfallen 07-15-2005 02:31 AM

Re: Huge vag. or well played?
 
Krishan and Boom-Boom:

If you had AA here, where would the extra bets go in? Do you think the answer to this question has any impact on how we play the initial hand?

Thanks.

Victor 07-15-2005 02:44 AM

Re: Huge vag. or well played?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I would raise the turn, I dont think AA or KK will 3 bet and AK might call down.

[/ QUOTE ]

aa or kk will 3bet. so will jj and 1010?

mscags 07-15-2005 04:06 AM

Re: Huge vag. or well played?
 
I don't mind this line, but I think it is best to try and figure out where you are at early on. I raise the flop everytime and see what happens. I probably cap if he reraises . If he bets into me again, than I am just calling, but I think there is a strong chance that your hand is good and you need to get some value from it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.