Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   99 (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=374660)

DMBFan23 11-09-2005 01:27 AM

Re: 99
 
[ QUOTE ]
I c/r this as a standard line. I'm recently reevaluating these types of plays so I could be off base. If i bust out of this tourney early I'll crunch some #s.

Surf

[/ QUOTE ]

opinion on PF? mine was that I wasnt pushing anyone out often enough and the pot was gonna be big enough to require showdown so why not choose my flops since the value is thin. on the right track?

Lmn55d 11-09-2005 01:27 AM

Re: 99
 
yea it really depends on his range. If the K on the flop was a Q I'd checkraise. It's probably close.

Surfbullet 11-09-2005 01:35 AM

Re: 99
 
[ QUOTE ]

opinion on PF? mine was that I wasnt pushing anyone out often enough and the pot was gonna be big enough to require showdown so why not choose my flops since the value is thin. on the right track?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I call inteding to c/r favorable flops, where favorable ='s "improved me" or "didn't appear to improve my opponents".

I'd probably let it go if I wasn't in a blind...if I was OTB and wanted to play I'd 4bet, I <3 position.

Surf

DMBFan23 11-09-2005 01:52 AM

Re: 99
 
agreed, I'm also more inclined to play raise or fold from the SB

oreogod 11-09-2005 03:12 AM

Re: 99
 
[ QUOTE ]
yea it really depends on his range. If the K on the flop was a Q I'd checkraise. It's probably close.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ditto.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.