Re: NL is boring?
 

If it's boring it means you're playing it better than most people.

Re: NL is boring?
 

I like playing limit a lot more.

It feels like I can play a lot more hands profitably in limit, but no limit goes more like:

fold fold fold fold limp/fold fold fold fold limp/call/fold fold fold fold fold fold fold raise/win blinds fold fold fold raise/reraise/all in/call.

In limit there is more blind stealing/defending...more fun IMO.

Re: NL is boring?
 

I find negative variance boring.

Hello NL.

Re: NL is boring?
 

What about Pot Limit?

Re: NL is boring?
 

[ QUOTE ]
It feels like I can play a lot more hands profitably in limit, but no limit goes more like:

fold fold fold fold limp/fold fold fold fold limp/call/fold fold fold fold fold fold fold raise/win blinds fold fold fold raise/reraise/all in/call.

In limit there is more blind stealing/defending...more fun IMO.



[/ QUOTE ]
huh?

Re: NL is boring?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No matter the stake, there's nothing more fun than having your top set/PF AA/nut straight check-raised in NL...In limit, even against the dullest player, you'll only get a few bets.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah but in no limit the wpt douchebag that c/r you takes 37 mins per decision, meanwhile you are sitting there scratching your butt. In limit there is a flurry of chips being thrown in the pot, much faster and more fun.

nothing worse than folding for two hours in a row and watching every hand take seven minutes.

[/ QUOTE ]

In NL you can play every hand and be profitable. That is virtually impossible at limit.

Re: NL is boring?
 

[ QUOTE ]
In NL you can play every hand and be profitable. That is nearly impossible at limit.

[/ QUOTE ]

basically, you missed the whole point.