Results
 

Thanks for the input.
Turn was 4c, vilian bet, I called
River was a 8h, villian bet I called.
Other than the preflop call, is this line ok?
I used to almost always raise this on the flop, but after reading a few posts about similar hands, it seems Im better off seeing calling down. If he has a hand like jj or 10-10 let him bet it the whole way, or if he has a hand like aa, or ak, I see a showdown for as cheap as possible. Is this Correct?

"Why should we raise this flop? I think its simpler to simply go wa/wb in position. " What does "wa/wb" stand for?

Re: Results
 

wa/wb is "way ahead, way behind" In position, its easy. Your goal is to put in one bet on every street. Hence, call or bet if checked to.

Re: Results
 

[ QUOTE ]
What does "wa/wb" stand for?

[/ QUOTE ]
way ahead/way behind. It is short for the situation you described in your post as it wins you the most when ahead of a hand that will fold to aggresion from you and costs you the least when you are behind a bigger hand.

Re: Kq in the cut off,
 

I don't mind cold calling the raise. I cold call AJ and KQ liberally without a read to the contrary.

On the flop you are probably ahead, and it's not like AJ or AQ are going to fold although they will probably check the turn. So I'd raise, if he three bets call down. This gets more action from JJ / 1010

Re: Kq in the cut off,
 

[ QUOTE ]
I cold call AJ and KQ liberally without a read to the contrary.

[/ QUOTE ]

Me no likey.

Re: Kq in the cut off,
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I cold call AJ and KQ liberally without a read to the contrary.

[/ QUOTE ]

Me no likey.

[/ QUOTE ]

I understand that Noam Chomsky has some pretty liberal poiltical opinions, but being liberal about cold-calling KQo and AJo is not an approach befitting an intellectual of his caliber.

In other words, cold-calling KQo and AJo generally just really sucks.