Re: 25/50 v mahatma
 

durr, you left off the option for the oft-forgotten min-3bet against a min-checkraise.

Re: 25/50 v mahatma
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
is mahatma capable of making that check minraise without a hand that has JJ beat with a sidepot?

[/ QUOTE ]

i heard mahatma is so good he can have 7high and beat theall in person's 6 high

[/ QUOTE ]

Is that in addition to the fireballs from his eyes and bolts of lightining from his ass?

[/ QUOTE ]

(I think that's just a myth)

He's probably a really nice person once you get to know him!

Re: 25/50 v mahatma
 

[ QUOTE ]
in all seriousness, if you fold he's freerolling for the main pot. Seems like a reasonable move with any pair here, if you are folding anything short of top pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

yea... but does he think i'll fold a8 to him? This i dunno...

Re: 25/50 v mahatma
 

[ QUOTE ]
durr, you left off the option for the oft-forgotten min-3bet against a min-checkraise.

[/ QUOTE ]

mehhhh.

Re: 25/50 v mahatma
 

[ QUOTE ]
durr, you left off the option for the oft-forgotten min-3bet against a min-checkraise.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then when mahatma caps it u go allin and shout "Welcome to NL Biitch

Re: 25/50 v mahatma
 

I hate the flop bet with a side pot and a marginal hand. I would be trying to get to a showdown as cheaply as possible.

Re: 25/50 v mahatma
 

ALL IN

but what do I know, I don't usually play this low

Re: 25/50 v mahatma
 

yuck

Re: 25/50 v mahatma
 

[ QUOTE ]
yuck

[/ QUOTE ]

which part(s)?

Re: 25/50 v mahatma
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
yuck

[/ QUOTE ]

which part(s)?

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont understand what part of the hand you like the way you played?

The initial PF call is the only thing I can agree with, and the coldcall of the SS push is debatable, but I think isolating is best.

The flop play is terrible, obviously it was complicated by your missclick, but I can't see how calling that minraise and folding on a blank turn can possible be profitable.

I think you butchered this on every street.