Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
 

Damn you must be nuts to cap when there's only been one raise.

Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
 

One more thing:
Pokerstove is still chugging away, but when you add in a third person limping with a wide range (40% minus premiums), equity looks like it drops to about 34% preflop. I suppose with position and dead blind money this equates to a slight edge. This plus the near unanymous vote to 3-bet makes me reconsider folding here.

Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
 

Given the opponent description, this is a real easy BEEEP! :We interrupt this response to say the answer is somewhere in the beginner/small stakes forum. Now back to your regularly scheduled response.: and I'm sure the voting will reflect that.

b

Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
 

We are essentially just debating a read here right? Jason thinks he is a tight/passive PF player with relatively static raising standards.

You belive he is capable of making adjustments based on position and table texture.

I guess the real thing to be debating is where the information for your read came from...ie what have you observed?

Because the statisical information seems to favor Jason's read.

Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
 

[ QUOTE ]

Because the statisical information seems to favor Jason's read.

[/ QUOTE ]

Where did you get the impression that a 13/8 is unduly tight with his PFR standards after a limper?

Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
 

The more poker you play the more you should realise that AQo is virtually never fit to cold-call with.

Only on extremely rare occasions and under perfect conditions would I even consider an isolation 3-bet with it and even then it's marginal at best. If ANY limper and ANY raiser are already in front, forget it, even if one's a fish and the other a donkey. The hand is weak, vulnerable and you're paying too much to even try. You do have a positional advantage, however. You get to see what's going on in front of you and that is precisely what enables you to MUCK IT without getting involved ass-backwards to begin with!

This opinion, of course, will get me branded as a weak-tight nit. But I don't care.

Do yourself a favor. Muck first and ask questions later.

Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
 

Given our position and the action thus far, this hand is far to big not to 3bet.

Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
 

[ QUOTE ]

My guess is there's at least a 3% margin of error in a sample as small as 2300 hands. Just a guess, based on how I've seen myself portrayed over 1k, 2k, and 5k hand samples.

Rob

[/ QUOTE ]

A 95% confidence interval is plus or minus 1.3%, assuming his true PFR is .12

Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
 

no love for the coldcall? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

3-bizzle!

Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Only on extremely rare occasions and under perfect conditions would I even consider an isolation 3-bet with it and even then it's marginal at best. If ANY limper and ANY raiser are already in front, forget it, even if one's a fish and the other a donkey

[/ QUOTE ]

It doesn't take perfect conditions at all. Auto-folding this, especially if it's a loose raiser in front of a loose limper is losing money. Especially if you can fold everyone else out behind you with a 3 bet with position.

I'd suggest practicing postflop play with this hand if you're really that worried about it against weak players.

[ QUOTE ]
The hand is weak, vulnerable and you're paying too much to even try.

[/ QUOTE ]

In many cases, you may also have the best hand.

b