Re: Forty Year Old Virgin vs. Wedding Crashers
 

[ QUOTE ]
it wasn't done in a throw-1000 jokes-a-minute style.

[/ QUOTE ]

That is really bizzare because I felt that it WAS throw-1000 jokes-a-minute style, a lot less faster pace than wedding crashers.

I also felt that there were a lot of jokes and shots that would have been far better off being left out, like the vomit on the face and him pissing on himself. just totally pointless shock/grossout humor that I didn't find funny at all.

but yeah, I saw both movies with the same people (except more people went and saw wedding crashers), and as soon as we got out of the movie we were debating which movie was better.

Re: Forty Year Old Virgin vs. Wedding Crashers
 

I'm so sorry sir. I didn't mean to offend your poll conducting sensibilities.

Re: Forty Year Old Virgin vs. Wedding Crashers
 

47 people are stupid or have not seen 40 Year Old Virgin. I thought the commercials and previews for it were awful, stupid, and it looked terrible. My girlfriend heard differently, so we went, and it is easily one of the funniest movies I've seen. By far the best in a long time. Wedding Crashers was just mediocre.

Re: Forty Year Old Virgin vs. Wedding Crashers
 

I smiled and/or chuckled during Wedding Crashers, my abs hurt when I walked out of 40 Year Old Virgin.

"Like big bags of sand."

Re: Forty Year Old Virgin vs. Wedding Crashers
 

i thought the first hour and twenty minutes of wedding crashers was great then i felt that it dragged on, when i left with the group of people i mentioned this and though everyone agreed the movie was funny as hell they all thought it should have ended at 1 hour 30 minutes.

as for 40 yr old i laughed the whole way. i like judd apatow and steve carell's humor.