Re: pokerconduct.com member post
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'd be willing to take you up on that offer. And I think several others will too.

[/ QUOTE ]

If there were some way of doing it securely, and making sure this guy doesn't run off with your money. I can't think of one, unless the site was willing to work with you. Which he'd claim meant they helped you on the tables as well.

Re: pokerconduct.com member post
 

You're an idiot. Visit my website www.youareanidiot.com.

Re: pokerconduct.com member post
 

If, as you claim, you are a skilled player, and know that the software is biased towards weaker starting hands, why don't you just adjust your play?

Play the weaker hands strongly, and fold the stronger ones. There. Solved your problem. Now you can go back to playing profitably online. See you at the tables!

Re: pokerconduct.com member post
 

Well, for one, If youll notice i did not write that article, another poster at pokerconduct.com did. I thought it was worthy to be read here. This biggest problem is that doesnt really solve the problem of the cards not being random. People are losing there life savings online. People are getting rich off of this & laughing all the way to the bank. Its a corporate mob. Thats not right. & besides you cant beat them, you get 2nd best hands, Its not as easy as playing crap & beating players with better hands, it doesnt work that way. Losing players are given better flops to keep them in the game, otherwise the sharks would put them out of the game quickly & table rake would not be maximized, But the biggest scam of all is the bots & house players that will take money from the accounts coded for distribution after they have won a sizeable amount.

Re: pokerconduct.com member post
 

[ QUOTE ]
You're an idiot. Visit my website www.youareanidiot.com.

[/ QUOTE ]

NH Sir

Re: pokerconduct.com member post
 

ESAD

Re: pokerconduct.com member post
 

This tinfoil hat wearing meat popsicle has been posting here since May?!?

Re: pokerconduct.com member post
 

God, I'm so incredibly annoyed by your posts. For the love of god, just stop now. Pretty much every single one of your posts explain how Online Poker is not legitimate, and they lead us to pokerconduct. Guess what, nobody cares.

Why don't you go explain to your mother that online poker is rigged? Maybe she'll at least pretend to care.

Re: pokerconduct.com member post
 

[ QUOTE ]
I started playing on-line poker back in 2003 at a sight claiming to be the first or oldest on-line room. I had played poker on and off for many years. I have read and studied books by first-class authors and clearly understand the importance of being a solid player and playing my best all of the time. When I started playing on-line in 2003 the sites I played at were on the up-and-up. I usually played several hours a day and it provided a steady income. However, in late 2004, it was as if someone flipped a switch and changed the game. It must have been around that time when software technology allowed the sites to begin preserving the bankrolls of lesser skilled players at the expense of accomplished players. Don't forget, volumes of players and rakes are how the sites make their money. Certainly folks have noticed that none of the poker rooms come out and say "our cards are totally random (or pseudo random)." Rather, they brag about the sophistication of their RNGs and make statements relating to no statistical bias regarding the cards dealt to their players. Think about it, if the weaker hands are allowed to win more than normal, as long as it applies to all, there is no statistical bias. Everyone's cards are being manipulated the same! This negatively affects skilled players a disproportionate amount of time as they will most often be going in with the best hand. I'm very much aware of poker great Bobby Baldwin stating that draw outs are a mirage, and I agree with his logic. However, what is happening on-line goes far beyond what Baldwin refers to. I have seen a fairly long term steady income vanish overnight. It is nothing short of the proliferation of software that enables sites to manipulate cards while still being able to make sidestepping statements regarding statistical bias. When we have an on-line site that offers a true poker game and is willing to state so in no uncertain terms, that site will have more players than it can host. Yes, they will be mostly skilled players and the competition will be tough. However, most folks would much rather get out-played by a real poker player than to have the rug pulled out from under them by software engineers catering to greed. The software has effectively made players once considered "suckers" the wise ones for playing in games that are enhanced for their preservation. And for the skilled players, I expect a large portion have already abandoned on-line poker. In the end greed will lose and someone will have the guts to bring back the real on-line poker sites of yesteryear. And yes, my post will be refuted by those whose income depends on the continued shearing of the unsuspecting.

[/ QUOTE ]


Haha, stockman's back. Where's your buddy King Striker? Isn't he on his sixth banning now? What happenned to making the final table at the WSOP and wearing a pokerconduct.com t-shirt? Guess the WSOP was rigged to, otherwise a player as good as you should definitely have made it.

Re: pokerconduct.com member post
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'd be willing to take you up on that offer. And I think several others will too.

[/ QUOTE ]