Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Multi-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   Final Table Stars $150 (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=364879)

colson10 10-25-2005 02:15 AM

Re: Final Table Stars $150
 
GG, absolutely on fire lately.

Blindcurve 10-25-2005 02:15 AM

Re: Final Table Stars $150
 
What the hey is going on with the deal?

Exitonly 10-25-2005 02:15 AM

Re: Final Table Stars $150
 
[ QUOTE ]
Christ, man, explain the 44 play to us mortals. I'dve folded that very quickly.

[/ QUOTE ]

How come?? buttons range was any two there..

10-25-2005 02:15 AM

Re: Final Table Stars $150
 
[ QUOTE ]
That pocket 4's hand was awesome [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm really surprised he dodged that J, Q, or 10 there. Great hand.

10-25-2005 02:21 AM

Re: Final Table Stars $150
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Christ, man, explain the 44 play to us mortals. I'dve folded that very quickly.

[/ QUOTE ]

How come?? buttons range was any two there..

[/ QUOTE ]

Well... stacks were pretty extreme, and also:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 57.0228 % 56.26% 00.77% { 44 }
Hand 2: 42.9772 % 42.21% 00.77% { random }

Throw in stacks and the prize pool for second, and I fold this a lot.

Exitonly 10-25-2005 02:25 AM

Re: Final Table Stars $150
 
ok so he's 56% and theres BB's money in the pot, and if he wins he's in contention for first, ,and when he loses he still isn't shortstack (or if he is, it's close)

Jurollo 10-25-2005 02:27 AM

Re: Final Table Stars $150
 
converter troubles...
this is the hand in question...
PokerStars Game #2887917298: Tournament #14115926, Hold'em No Limit - Level XIX (8000/16000) - 2005/10/25 - 02:11:01 (ET)
Table '14115926 30' Seat #7 is the button
Seat 4: sirio11 (123910 in chips)
Seat 5: BPA234 (486820 in chips)
Seat 7: rudie_1068 (41770 in chips)
sirio11: posts the ante 800
BPA234: posts the ante 800
rudie_1068: posts the ante 800
sirio11: posts small blind 8000
BPA234: posts big blind 16000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
BPA234 said, "ty"
rudie_1068: raises 24970 to 40970 and is all-in
sirio11: raises 82140 to 123110 and is all-in
BPA234: calls 107110
*** FLOP *** [7d 5s 9h]
*** TURN *** [7d 5s 9h] [Ad]
*** RIVER *** [7d 5s 9h Ad] [3s]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
sirio11: shows [4s 4h] (a pair of Fours)
BPA234: shows [Qh Th] (high card Ace)
sirio11 collected 164280 from side pot
rudie_1068: shows [Jd 4c] (high card Ace)
sirio11 collected 125310 from main pot
BPA234 said, "gg"
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 289590 Main pot 125310. Side pot 164280. | Rake 0
Board [7d 5s 9h Ad 3s]
Seat 4: sirio11 (small blind) showed [4s 4h] and won (289590) with a pair of Fours
Seat 5: BPA234 (big blind) showed [Qh Th] and lost with high card Ace
Seat 7: rudie_1068 (button) showed [Jd 4c] and lost with high card Ace

0evg0 10-25-2005 02:30 AM

Re: Final Table Stars $150
 
[ QUOTE ]
ok so he's 56% and theres BB's money in the pot, and if he wins he's in contention for first, ,and when he loses he still isn't shortstack (or if he is, it's close)

[/ QUOTE ]

YOU MEAN HE'D BE IN THE RED-ZONE IF HE LOST???

AUTO CALL, CHECK/FOLD THE FLOP.

Jurollo 10-25-2005 02:30 AM

Re: Final Table Stars $150
 
I think that is a fairly straightforward play personally, I dont think there are too many advanced concepts in play here. I am trying to obtain 40K more in chips with relatively little risk against a villian who could be playing any two. I am pushing in an attempt to iso against the shortstack and keep the big stack from coming back over the top of me. Fairly straightforward I don't see the problem anyone has with it.
~Justin

ilya 10-25-2005 02:31 AM

Re: Final Table Stars $150
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Christ, man, explain the 44 play to us mortals. I'dve folded that very quickly.

[/ QUOTE ]

How come?? buttons range was any two there..

[/ QUOTE ]

There was also the timing of his bet. He hesitated for a few seconds. To my mind that makes hands in the top 5% a tiny bit less likely and hands in the next 30% or so considerably less likely.

Not that it really matters, I think it's a clear overpush pretty much no matter what.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.