Re: Jax again proves he\'s the stupidest man alive
 

[ QUOTE ]
I am not using my own definition, and I am really not trying to equate it to good or bad here. I am simply trying to assert that it is legitimate that saying "homosexuality is unnatural" IS true under certain definitions (from certain points of view). At the same time "homosexuallity is natural" can be true. It depends on your definition. Either way, I am insisting that this is more a semantic discussion than a logical one.

[/ QUOTE ]

would you like some syrup with your waffles? re-read your posts... i think you're 'contradicting' yourself again (that's what you call it when you lie).

http://www.papermosaic.com/images/lichtenstein.jpg

Re: Jax again proves he\'s the stupidest man alive
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I am not using my own definition, and I am really not trying to equate it to good or bad here. I am simply trying to assert that it is legitimate that saying "homosexuality is unnatural" IS true under certain definitions (from certain points of view). At the same time "homosexuallity is natural" can be true. It depends on your definition. Either way, I am insisting that this is more a semantic discussion than a logical one.

[/ QUOTE ]

would you like some syrup with your waffles? re-read your posts... i think you're 'contradicting' yourself again (that's what you call it when you lie).

http://www.papermosaic.com/images/lichtenstein.jpg

[/ QUOTE ]

It is not a contradiction. There IS MORE THAN ONE DEFINITION FOR NATURAL. Paradox - n - A seemingly contradictory statement that may nonetheless be true (American Heritage Dictionary.)
http://www.bartleby.com/61/77/P0057700.html