Re: respondents to questions
 

I thought that we were are all crushing the microlimits in our own special way? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

I don't think that I've seen anyone post win rates of less that 5BB/100 over 100K hands, so I'm pretty that you'll be well served by entering everyone's posts into a Matrix, then calculate the determinant to narrow down the most correct of the posts for extreme results.

Re: respondents to questions
 

[ QUOTE ]
to mister wookie:

excuse me, it is anything BUT poor reasoning. if i am in ignorance, my ignorance includes an ignorance to what is "right". it is precisely because i am ignorant of what is "right", that i ask, who can i identify as capable of replying in a "right" fashion. i can cite multiple instances of hand evaluations that seem "correct" to me, but are also obviously antinomies. who of the authors of these conflicting interpretations is "right"?

and please donot reply with that commoness, it's all relative, or, they both are.

your comment was exceedingly poor reasoning, and exceedingly arrogant as well.

[/ QUOTE ]
totally! Put that bitch in his place!

OMFGROFLMAO WOOK JUST GOT PWNEDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!111

Hey I say we make this lying thief guy a mod he so obviously knows more than me or wook. What do you say guys? Oh wait you don't know sh*t about poker either. Guess we are just screwed.

Re: respondents to questions
 

[ QUOTE ]
Haha, these are so old school. This who taught us to play.

[/ QUOTE ]
No those aren't old school. ML regulars when I started (back in my nano days):

bisonbison
sfer (now the daver)
sthief09 (now Josh)
Chris Daddy Cool
btspider
Ed Miller would even make an appearance sometimes!

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: respondents to questions
 

[ QUOTE ]
you people all (well, not all, but most) need to calm down and realize this isn't an entirely dumb question.

and because the poster is new, how's about we all act normal?

i don't think certain threads would have been killed if made by certain posters

[/ QUOTE ]

"Dear Posters of Micro Limit,

I cannot be bothered with taking the time and energy of reading and studying SSHE or <insert authoritative poker text> and then reading posts and posting thoughtfully.

Instead, I'd like for those of you who have taken the effort to improve their game to point out all posters who they feel as being poker gawds so that I can have poker knowledge spoonfed to me.

Also, as a special note to the mods, I humbly request that all of my questions be answered by Sklansky, Malmuth, and Miller. They owe me that for posting on their boards.

Thank you."

Re: respondents to questions
 

[ QUOTE ]
you people all (well, not all, but most) need to calm down and realize this isn't an entirely dumb question.

and because the poster is new, how's about we all act normal?

i don't think certain threads would have been killed if made by certain posters

[/ QUOTE ]
I thought the answers were good. OP asked if there was a way to "determine the skill level and profitability" of posters. How would you answer that question?

We can start a "respected poster" thread if you want. It'll probably end up similar to the archive one. Maybe people are just being coy and waiting for someone else to start listing people so they can see if they're included.

Regardless, OP never asked for a list. And his tone left much to be desired, hence our responses.

Re: respondents to questions
 

yeah, nice catch tilt. Some people overreacted a bit, but I think it was more because of OP's tone, and not because of the request. Also, it did spark some good discussion with eskimo, myself, numeri, and a few others.

Re: respondents to questions
 

[ QUOTE ]
bisonbison
sfer (now the daver)
sthief09 (now Josh)
Chris Daddy Cool
btspider
Ed Miller would even make an appearance sometimes!



[/ QUOTE ]

those were the old days. Ofcourse back then I just read the forum, and never posted. But I did learn a lot from those guys.

Re: respondents to questions
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you people all (well, not all, but most) need to calm down and realize this isn't an entirely dumb question.

and because the poster is new, how's about we all act normal?

i don't think certain threads would have been killed if made by certain posters

[/ QUOTE ]
I thought the answers were good. OP asked if there was a way to "determine the skill level and profitability" of posters. How would you answer that question?

We can start a "respected poster" thread if you want. It'll probably end up similar to the archive one. Maybe people are just being coy and waiting for someone else to start listing people so they can see if they're included.

Regardless, OP never asked for a list. And his tone left much to be desired, hence our responses.

[/ QUOTE ]

sure.
i think it was tonal too.
just trying to point out what i pointed out.

want a list?
 

instead of listing good player(s)/poster(s), since clearly I'd be on the top of a list of one, here are some links that might help you decide for yourself.

AIM name thread with limits

2005 goals thread

the coaching link

Re: Chipotle and upping post count
 

Let's not forget Qdoba - Chipotle's bastard twin brother.

They finally opened one in Morgantown. First time I had one of those beautiful, beautiful burritos since I left Colorado. I ate there three times in 2 days (~4200 calories!!).

Does that put my winrate at 1400 calories/meal? Cause that corrolates to my awesome post count.

And to kill two pigeons with one stone, 1/2 6max does rule.