Lori
01-07-2004, 03:14 AM
People will have to make some assumptions about this one.
For sake of argument, we'll say that Joe wins at 1BB per 100 hands.
How many hands does he need to play to be 50% likely or better, to have a winning session in a full ring game, assuming he starts on the big blind.
Because of the mechanics of winning poker play, I'm thinking that most sessions under 30 or 40 hands will be losers, even for a winning player.
Im as interested in the assumptions you make as the actual answer, although i feel the answer would be very interesting from a proposition bet point of view (two people betting on an unsuspecting third party)
Lori
For sake of argument, we'll say that Joe wins at 1BB per 100 hands.
How many hands does he need to play to be 50% likely or better, to have a winning session in a full ring game, assuming he starts on the big blind.
Because of the mechanics of winning poker play, I'm thinking that most sessions under 30 or 40 hands will be losers, even for a winning player.
Im as interested in the assumptions you make as the actual answer, although i feel the answer would be very interesting from a proposition bet point of view (two people betting on an unsuspecting third party)
Lori