View Full Version : BB defense #2

07-15-2005, 10:13 PM

PokerStars Game #2112194734: Tournament #10107566, Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2005/07/15 - 22:10:24 (ET)
Table '10107566 1' Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: badgolf (940 in chips)
Seat 2: DAD557 (3075 in chips)
Seat 3: dulltom (1465 in chips)
Seat 4: Tazman23 (1455 in chips)
Seat 5: fatfish (1950 in chips)
Seat 8: JM33W (3050 in chips)
Seat 9: pmorganb (1565 in chips)
JM33W: posts small blind 75
pmorganb: posts big blind 150
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to pmorganb [9c 9d]
badgolf: folds
DAD557: folds
dulltom: folds
Tazman23: folds
fatfish: raises 450 to 600
JM33W: folds
pmorganb: raises 965 to 1565 and is all-in

07-15-2005, 10:14 PM
Standard, yeah.

07-15-2005, 10:16 PM
eh...a little better. i'd do the same - understanding that it's quite possible i'll get called, racing against overs. gamblings fun though!

07-15-2005, 10:25 PM
Do it -- Do it. Do it.

07-15-2005, 10:30 PM
Haha...didn't understand everyone's reaction until I saw the blinds. This is a no-no early on, right?

07-15-2005, 10:43 PM
I might call here early on. You have a PP, a good one, and you can check dark and play good.

07-16-2005, 02:26 AM
you're right - i think the thought of calling off 1/3 of my stack as the short stack wasn't that appealing to me and i wasn't confident i could outplay the guy on an overcard flop.

07-16-2005, 02:38 AM
I said early on. Now, it's a pretty clear push, unless you think Stop and go is a better idea. (I love stop and go, but here, I don't do it).

07-16-2005, 02:40 AM
sorry i shouldn't be posting and multi-tabling at the same time. i love the stop and go too, but i agree with you i thought that any stop and go would probably turn in to a stop and stop.