Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2003, 03:15 PM
Bozeman Bozeman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: On the road again
Posts: 1,213
Default Standard error, uncertainty?

Suppose you have n measurements of x (with random but no systematic error). What is your uncertainty in the value of x (such that correct value is within one uncertainty of your average 68% of the time)? What if you know the exact value of x? Does it change for n very small?

Thanks,
Craig
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-15-2003, 10:39 AM
MrBlini MrBlini is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 333
Default Re: Standard error, uncertainty?

If the random error is normal, this is Student's t-Distribution.

The distribution of t, the variable defined in Equation (1), is approximately normal for large sample sizes. Thus the difference between the sample mean and the population mean--the numerator of Equation (1)--is approximately normally distributed with standard deviation s/sqrt(N). One standard deviation is thus easy to estimate--just divide the sample standard deviation s by the square root of N, the number of samples.

For example, several members of the Zoo decide to measure the average length of a circulated 1996-series $100 bill. They gather their shoeboxes and find N=44 bills from that series, enough samples that Student's t-Distribution is almost identical to a normal distribution. With a plastic engineering ruler (a poor choice IMO), they find that the sample mean is 6.1374 inches and the sample standard deviation s is .0192. They divide this by the square root of N=44 to estimate the standard deviation of the difference between the sample mean and the population mean, finding that s/sqrt(N)=.0029 inches. They conclude that, to within one standard deviation of the t-Distribution, the mean length of a 1996 series $100 bill is 6.1374 +- .0029 inches, or between 6.1345 inches and 6.1402 inches.

As you can see, for large N, the uncertainty in the difference between the sample mean and the population mean decreases as the square root of N.

Your intuition that this all changes when N is small is spot on. For small values of N, you cannot use the normal approximation to the t-Distribution for anything but a very rough guess. You need to use actual t values, which means you'll need mathematical software or statistical tables to solve such problems. The differences between the t-Distribution and the normal distribution are illustrated nicely on this page at Stanford.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.