Party 2/4 verus 3/6 question

Ive mainly been playing a lot of 2/4 limit at party and found that the games seem to be the softest 2/4 games that Ive found.

Im wondering, let's assume that I had the bankroll to play either (maybe over 2000), and I had the long term results to prove that Im successful at 2/4, is there any reason to play the 3/6?

What are other peoples experiences that have played both of these.

Also I mainly only play full tables and not short handed games.

[rhizome]

What does this have to do with bonuses?

Party doesn't have 6 max tables at 2/4, so that helps contribute to the softness of the 2/4 full tables. 3/6 is tougher.

If you are beating 2/4 for x BB/100, then as long as you can beat 3/6 for 2/3x BB/100 you should move up.

I was in the wrong forum when I posted this, sorry.

I meant to post it in "Internet" but happened to be browsing the "Internet Bonuses" and forgot to switch back.

Is there anyway to move it?

[WackityWhiz]

there are actual poker forums too, just so you know

up near the top buddy [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

It's not a question about how to play poker, it's a site specific question.

I know it's in the wrong forum and I apologized so lay off.

You might say that my post wasted people's time that are hear to learn about bonus whoring. But then you have to ask yourself, what is your post doing??

[fire_fly]

i found your rebuttal entertaining [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

(and you prob. find my spelling suck-ass-edness entertaining)

[ncboiler]

At party I find the difference between 2/4 and 3/6 to be pretty drastic. 3/6 seems to be full of TAG's with an occassional +30 player thrown in

[Soh]

I tried to move up to 3-6 a few times, and everytime I found out that I can make more money playing 2-4.

Even if you're good enough to make around 2bb/100 with 2-4. maybe you're still not good enough to move up to 3-6.

Soh