Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > The Stock Market

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 04-06-2005, 04:11 PM
eastbay eastbay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 647
Default Investment Banks/Quants/Gambling

I browsed the book "My Life As a Quant" by some guy who went from physicist to quant analyst for Goldman Sachs. This was sort of interesting to me as my background is similar.

I realized how ignorant I am of investment banks and what they do. One thing they seem to do is employ traders who trade in, say, bond markets. I guess the quants help advise the traders in finding good trading opportunities.

The role of the model as described by Derman in the book is to "turn opinions into prices" and after reading about how some of the models work, I realized there is almost a perfect analogy with poker playing. In poker, a "model" (I guess we think of this as an analysis) turns opinions about your opponent's holdings, actions and reactions to your moves into an expected value of your play. This is no different from turning opinions about interest rate movements into expected values of trades in a bond market.

So really when you come down to it, are these guys at investment banks just glorified gamblers? Do they recognize the parallels between what they do and playing poker or other gambling games?

My second question is: if these guys are really good at this, why don't they quit, take their accumulated bonus money (which I hear can be sizable), and make their own fortune doing the same? (I guess there is a risk/return equation here to be considered.)

Are there individual investors applying this kind of analysis in the "fixed income" (don't know why it's called that) securities markets? Is that not a practical way to make money in the markets because the competition is too good?

It's obviously possible in the "poker market" because the competition doesn't even know how to think about these things well, or really care to, oftentimes. I guess the story is very different in the big investment markets, but it's not entirely clear why, by comparison, the "poker market" is so inefficient compared to, say, the bond market. Or is it?

Anyway, long, rambling and semi-coherent, but would enjoy feedback from anyone who knows about these things.

eastbay
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.