Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-13-2004, 03:37 AM
Lmn55d Lmn55d is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Default Question about Winrate

Ok, if I have a winrate of 1.42BB/100 after 4000 hands, what would you guys say is the range of my true winrate. Like, is it possible that I'm a 3BB/100 player and just have a sample size that is too small?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-13-2004, 05:06 AM
uuDevil uuDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Remembering P. Tillman
Posts: 246
Default Re: Question about Winrate

You have to provide your standard deviation as well. But this is such a small sample I'd guess the answer is easily yes.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-13-2004, 06:30 AM
pzhon pzhon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 66
Default Re: Question about Winrate

[ QUOTE ]
You have to provide your standard deviation as well. But this is such a small sample I'd guess the answer is easily yes.

[/ QUOTE ]
The standard deviation changes from player to player and game to game, but usually not by a huge amount.

Let's assume the standard deviation in 100 hands is 15. In 40x100 hands, the standard deviation of the win rate should be about 15/sqrt(40)~2.4. After 4000 hands, your true strength is very likely to be within 2 standard deviations, 1.4+-4.7 BB/100. That's not a very tight estimate. It is hard to conclude anything from only 4000 hands.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-13-2004, 11:58 AM
jason1990 jason1990 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 205
Default Re: Question about Winrate

[ QUOTE ]
The standard deviation changes from player to player and game to game, but usually not by a huge amount.

[/ QUOTE ]
If we're talking about "good" players, I would probably agree. But a weak-tight player, or a LAG, or perhaps anyone with a true winrate that is negative, could likely have a standard deviation that differs significantly from the "norm".

I just wanted to mention this because the OP might be trying to decide if he's a "good" player. And, it seems to me, the assumption of a 15BB/100 SD presupposes this fact to some degree.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-13-2004, 12:37 PM
Lmn55d Lmn55d is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: Question about Winrate

how do I find out my standard deviation?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-13-2004, 04:20 PM
uuDevil uuDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Remembering P. Tillman
Posts: 246
Default Re: Question about Winrate

[ QUOTE ]
how do I find out my standard deviation?

[/ QUOTE ]
If you have PokerTracker, it's under
"Session Notes" tab -> "More Detail..." button
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-13-2004, 08:08 PM
Lmn55d Lmn55d is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re: Question about Winrate

ah cool. So say I know my current winrate after a small sample size of hands and my standard deviation. How can I find out the range of my true winrate?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-13-2004, 08:27 PM
ode ode is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 13
Default Re: Question about Winrate

How much is large enough sample size to draw a conclusion on if you are or aren't a winning player at a certain limit (on let's say 97% certainty).

Is it 50k+ hands, 100k+ hands?

I currently have 29,138 hands of $2/4, BB/100 of 3.52, SD/100 of 15.2394.

I'm pretty certain I'm a winner, since I've been playing and winning for quite a long time. Those are just since I recently started logging with PT.

But so, how much is enough when speaking of sample size?

/ode
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-14-2004, 03:13 AM
uuDevil uuDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Remembering P. Tillman
Posts: 246
Default Re: Question about Winrate

[ QUOTE ]
ah cool. So say I know my current winrate after a small sample size of hands and my standard deviation. How can I find out the range of my true winrate?

[/ QUOTE ]

pzhon showed the idea above.

The interval

WR +/- 2*SE

will include your true win rate with 95.4% confidence, where SE= SD/sqrt(N), SD and WR are in BB/100, and N= #hands (in hundreds)

The factor 2 can be varied depending on the desired confidence:

1 -> 68% confidence
1.96 -> 95% confidence
3 -> 99.7% confidence

The greater the desired confidence, the wider the interval.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-14-2004, 04:13 AM
uuDevil uuDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Remembering P. Tillman
Posts: 246
Default Re: Question about Winrate

[ QUOTE ]
How much is large enough sample size to draw a conclusion on if you are or aren't a winning player at a certain limit (on let's say 97% certainty).

Is it 50k+ hands, 100k+ hands?


[/ QUOTE ]

Whether or not you are a winning player depends on WR, SD, and N (#hands). Calculate the quantity

WR/(SD/sqrt(N))

This is the distance from breakeven in # of SD. For >= 97% confidence, this quantity >= 2.17.

[ QUOTE ]

I currently have 29,138 hands of $2/4, BB/100 of 3.52, SD/100 of 15.2394.

I'm pretty certain I'm a winner, since I've been playing and winning for quite a long time. Those are just since I recently started logging with PT.

But so, how much is enough when speaking of sample size?



[/ QUOTE ]

It's relative, but 3.52/(15.2/sqrt(291))=3.95 so you can be better than 99.9% confident you are a winning player.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.