Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-26-2004, 10:45 AM
Easy E Easy E is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
Default Anyone an SI subscriber? Poker article by Rick Reilly

Rick Reilly: Life of Reilly
This poker craze is the biggest waste of time since Stevie Wonder went to a mime festival


You have to be an SI subscriber to get this online. Anyone care to reproduce it for us?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-26-2004, 11:04 AM
B Dids B Dids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sea-town!!
Posts: 326
Default Re: Anyone an SI subscriber? Poker article by Rick Reilly

Why would I read somebody by Rick Reilly on purpose?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-26-2004, 12:37 PM
Tyler Durden Tyler Durden is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: DC area (Arlington, VA)
Posts: 1,351
Default Re: Anyone an SI subscriber? Poker article by Rick Reilly

Why would someone read your post and not make sense of it? How about b/c it makes no sense at all?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-26-2004, 12:46 PM
Edge34 Edge34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 255
Default Re: Anyone an SI subscriber? Poker article by Rick Reilly

Here goes:

"I am clueless. I am about as plugged in as an Amish toaster. Not only do I not know what's up, I would need a GPS and two sherpas to find up.

This became clear the other day when I heard my fairly athletic 17-year-old son on the phone, trying to "get a bunch of players" together. And he said how "the game yesterday was sick!" And how he was working on his "reads," needed "a really good kicker" and "wouldn't it be cool to get on ESPN someday?"

And I thought to myself, Hey, that's great! He and his schoolmates are playing some backyard football!

Wrong. He and his schoolmates are playing Texas Hold 'Em in the basement. He and his schoolmates and what seems like half the formerly sane world have been sucked into the televised poker craze. Do you realize that the 2004 World Series of Poker drew bigger ratings on ESPN than the first two games of the last Stanley Cup finals? And by one website's estimate, $100 million is bet on poker every day online?

So I started watching. And I came to this startling conclusion: This poker craze is the biggest waste of time since Stevie Wonder went to a mime festival. From what I can tell, it seems to be a lot of people who sit in dark rooms and watch a lot of other people sit in those windowless rooms wearing sunglasses.

I haven't seen this many doughy people since the Krispy Kreme company picnic. Do they tan under 40-watt bulbs? Where is the thrill in watching guys with 300 cholesterol levels play cards and rattle their chip stacks 1,000 different ways? The current World Series of Poker champ, Greg (Fossilman) Raymer, wears back-of-the-comic-book gag glasses and gemstone necklaces and goes about 275 pounds, though a good 3% of that is muscle.

Now Bravo has a hit with Celebrity Poker Showdown, featuring celebs like Carrie Fisher saying breathlessly to Mimi Rogers, "I'm all in!" You know your sport is smokin' when you can get Carrie Fisher.

I hear what you're saying. You baboon. You don't have the foggiest idea what it takes to play world-class poker. It's cerebral. It's psychological. It requires patience, aggression and brains.

Really? Is that why a guy named Chris Moneymaker won the 2003 World Series of Poker after having played the game on the Internet for three years? Or why actor Ben Affleck won a major open poker tournament this year? Can you imagine somebody taking up basketball three years ago and suddenly becoming the leading scorer in the NBA? Or Affleck winning the Buick Open?

Yet teens hold up these pasty poker pudges as gods. I never hear them talk about Tiger Woods or Kevin Garnett anymore. They talk about Chris (Jesus) Ferguson and Phil (the Unabomber) Laak, who peers out from under a sweatshirt hood for the whole game, shadowboxes during hands and kneels behind the dealer as the last two cards are turned. Maybe he should pray. God: "Look, let's put the whole Fallujah thing on hold. I need to make sure Phil gets a six here."

Hey, at least the guy gets out of his chair. Everybody else just sits. These people spend more time on their butts than FDR did. And now you, too, can get the entire 2003 World Series of Poker on DVD, featuring all that sitting! (Comes with an ice pick to insert into your brain.)

The dullness is built right into the game. The way to win at Texas Hold 'Em is to be as expressionless as drywall and fold a lot. Whoo-ee! You talk about exciting! What's ESPN going to put on next, the World Hairline-Receding Championships?

Is all this a good thing for teenagers? Is this what we want -- kids who used to be outside on perfect fall afternoons suddenly hunched in the basement like Nathan Detroit's floating crap game? Is it a good thing that my son's buddies are all wearing green eyeshades and taking one another's busboy tips for hours on end while their muscles turn to linguini?

Betty George of the North American Training Institute, which runs youth gambling-prevention programs, doesn't think so. She says that a teenager who gambles is two to three times more likely than an adult to become addicted to gambling. "We get a call every day from another teenager who's trying to figure out how to tell his parents he lost the car insurance money," she says.

What really sucks is that the kids are losing their own cash while the poker stars sort of aren't. Do you realize that Moneymaker won his World Series of Poker stake in a $40 Internet contest? He might as well be your grandmother betting buttons.

Hey, I play poker with my buddies. But it's four times a year and comes with the requisite bad meatballs, cold beer and dirty jokes. Poker isn't a sport, it isn't for kids, and it sure as hell shouldn't be on my damn sports channels.

Sorry, I'm all out. "






To be totally fair, I think one of the points he's getting at is how the TV poker thing has taken over much of the young kids who would normally be doing other, "more productive" things, such as participating in sports. And a lot of these kids DON'T know how to play responsibly, and WILL end up losing money they shouldn't. Just take it with a grain of salt I guess. TV poker isn't for everyone, and for those who aren't really into the game, its going to be really, REALLY boring. Guess he's one of these. He's still the reason I read SI's back page first.

-Edge
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-26-2004, 12:57 PM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Re: Anyone an SI subscriber? Poker article by Rick Reilly

[ QUOTE ]


To be totally fair, I think one of the points he's getting at is how the TV poker thing has taken over much of the young kids who would normally be doing other, "more productive" things, such as participating in sports.

[/ QUOTE ]

Although I tend to agree that gambling could become an issue for many teens if their parents aren't careful and look for the signs of a problem, I don't suscribe to the theory that kids are playing poker instead of doing more athletic things. If they weren't playing poker, tey would be playing Halo or Madden or looking at internet porn or doing whatever other non-athletic things kids were doing 2 years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-26-2004, 01:08 PM
Neil Stevens Neil Stevens is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 443
Default Re: Anyone an SI subscriber? Poker article by Rick Reilly

[ QUOTE ]
This poker craze is the biggest waste of time since Stevie Wonder went to a mime festival

[/ QUOTE ]
Bet they wouldn't publish that if poker were on Time Warner networks instead of just Disney and News.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-26-2004, 01:13 PM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Re: Anyone an SI subscriber? Poker article by Rick Reilly

[ QUOTE ]
Really? Is that why a guy named Chris Moneymaker won the 2003 World Series of Poker after having played the game on the Internet for three years? Or why actor Ben Affleck won a major open poker tournament this year? Can you imagine somebody taking up basketball three years ago and suddenly becoming the leading scorer in the NBA? Or Affleck winning the Buick Open?

[/ QUOTE ]

This is why I don't like tournament poker.

Justin A
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-26-2004, 01:23 PM
Sponger15SB Sponger15SB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Isla Vista
Posts: 1,536
Default Re: Anyone an SI subscriber? Poker article by Rick Reilly

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This poker craze is the biggest waste of time since Stevie Wonder went to a mime festival

[/ QUOTE ]
Bet they wouldn't publish that if poker were on Time Warner networks instead of just Disney and News.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think it makes the story any less true though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-26-2004, 01:26 PM
wayabvpar wayabvpar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Circa Seattle, Wa
Posts: 221
Default Re: Anyone an SI subscriber? Poker article by Rick Reilly

Rick Reilly still a douchebag. Check.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-26-2004, 01:30 PM
Edge34 Edge34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 255
Default Re: Anyone an SI subscriber? Poker article by Rick Reilly

Hey Nottom,

I agree with you on this one, and not Reilly. I should've been more clear in my post. As a matter of fact, I started to play poker in high school while playing varsity football among other things, and still play football in college. Of course, I still find time for poker AND those other non-athletic things. This article being in THE sports magazine, I just naturally figured this was one of the points of his article. If he were just to write about kids being irresponsible gamblers, it wouldn't tie in to well to SI, I don't imagine.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.