|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: NoTalent | |||
| y |
   
|
10 | 7.30% |
| n |
  
|
64 | 46.72% |
| o |
  
|
63 | 45.99% |
| Voters: 137. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
05-16-2005, 05:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: What site do you prefer? (all factors considered)
Empire... i know, i know... you meant Party/Party-skin.... but I absolutely hate Party's support (and the support that they provide for the other skins)... since Empire started their VIP support, I haven't had a single problem through them that wasn't resolved through 1 email.
|
|
#3
05-16-2005, 01:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What site do you prefer? (all factors considered)
I chose Party first and foremost simply because I feel their game structure and amount of fish outweigh the horrible software and customer support. Stars was a VERY close second because I feel they are the exact opposite of Party (slow structure,better players/good software,good support).
|
|
#4
05-16-2005, 02:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: What site do you prefer? (all factors considered)
I do pretty well at Stars and Pokerroom. The slow structure gives me time to find a good spot and before I put my chips in the middle. At party, the blinds seem to eat half my stack befor I find a flop I want to bet.
Also, while I make some mistakes, I rarely make two big ones in one tourney. At the sites with the slower structures, you often have enough chips to make a comeback after making a mistake, not so with party. If you start with 1,500, and loose 400to blinds or a mistake, you're still in the hunt with 1100. But if you start with 800 and lose 400, you're crippled. I chose Pokerroom over Stars because I like the 10 seat format better, and because it's a bit fishier (plenty of fish at Stars though, don't know why everyone says their aren't).
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
