|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
unusual bad beat. Thought it was interesting
Now everyone talks about the quality of play as you progress. I don't believe it. I think the fish (myself included) run the gamot. It's just a bankroll issue. Not quality of play. Now I really felt like there was a good chance I was beat here, so you can flame me all you want for not raising more preflop, or that I should have laid this down. But I bet out knowing I was either way ahead or way behind. What was really interesting was what he had.
Very first hand. Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t15 (10 handed) converter UTG (t800) Hero (t800) UTG+2 (t800) MP1 (t800) MP2 (t800) MP3 (t800) CO (t800) Button (t800) SB (t800) BB (t800) Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t70</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP2 calls t70, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, BB calls t55. Flop: (t220) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets t300</font>, MP2 folds, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to t730 (All-In)</font>, Hero calls t430 (All-In). Turn: (t1680) 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 2 all-in)</font> River: (t1680) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 2 all-in)</font> Final Pot: t1680 Take a guess. I'll make it alittle easier for you and tell you "he had no spade". lol Later, Rick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: unusual bad beat. Thought it was interesting
89.
This doesnt seem all that interesting. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: unusual bad beat. Thought it was interesting
i guarantee u will get ZERO sympathy from ANYONE on this forum. period. you bet way too much on the flop. thats YOUR mistake. this is a CHECKABLE flop. feel free to even check fold. your hand is very weak right now. interesting as to what he had? 56 with the 5 or spades and nutted up. WHO CARES. you make money off of bad people. get used to it. when you drop 20+ buyins IN A ROW, then you are allowed to make a bad beat post. holla
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: unusual bad beat. Thought it was interesting
Raptor. Wasn't looking for sympathy. When I put my money in I really didn't think it would be a true "bad beat". I expected to get beat by the flush or at least be up against a good draw. The guy flipped over TJ no spades. Just thought that was comical. No need to get your panties in a wad.
Later, Rick |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: unusual bad beat. Thought it was interesting
lol, panties in a wad? you come to the wrong forum for sympathy. im not berating you. im telling you that if you get YOUR panties in a wad over something like THIS, you have a LOT to learn about poker. holla
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: unusual bad beat. Thought it was interesting
[ QUOTE ]
this is a CHECKABLE flop. [/ QUOTE ] Really? I probably bet 150 and drop to a push. Checking seems terribly weak. Enlighten me? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: unusual bad beat. Thought it was interesting
i think that i would probably do the same... a flat call would give me pause, but on the turn, i'd probably continue on betting figuring it was a 4-to-the-flush draw (unless a spade turned up).
that's just me though. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: unusual bad beat. Thought it was interesting
[ QUOTE ]
i think that i would probably do the same... a flat call would give me pause, but on the turn, i'd probably continue on betting figuring it was a 4-to-the-flush draw (unless a spade turned up). that's just me though. [/ QUOTE ] FWIW I wouldn't bet the turn if called. There's no need to protect against draws because I'm not even sure my hand is good at that point. Then again, I don't raise as much PF so I'm working with a much smaller pot at that point. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: unusual bad beat. Thought it was interesting
that's the main problem-- not raising more preflop... it's bad to not place a significant preflop raise at the 800 chip SNGs first round with a premium hand... people will still usually call--- none of the idiots have been weeded out yet
the small preflop raise--- you're right... betting again on the turn would probably be foolish after a flat call... |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: unusual bad beat. Thought it was interesting
People get so upset by bad beat posts here, yet they always seem to draw a fair number of responses. I guess people just need to show their superior poker Zen every now and then.
Doesn't it occur to people that if you don't like bad beat posts - and this one even does you the courtesy of announcing that it is a bad beat post - the best way to discourage them is not to respond? |
|
|