|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Follow the fish? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
71 | 51.45% |
| No |
  
|
67 | 48.55% |
| Voters: 138. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#12
08-11-2005, 08:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Positions of authority and being a \"good example\" (improved)
[ QUOTE ]
So you are saying an internet mod that admits to of smoked weed in the past should removed of his title? [/ QUOTE ] I like this sentence...it reads funny. 
|
|
#13
08-11-2005, 08:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positions of authority and being a \"good example\" (improved)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] leaders at all levels should lead by example. [/ QUOTE ] So you are saying an internet mod that admits to of smoked weed in the past should removed of his title? [/ QUOTE ] did you say [censored] was getting grandfathered in? I can't find it in the rules
|
|
#14
08-11-2005, 08:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positions of authority and being a \"good example\" (improved)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] *** You are ignoring this user *** [/ QUOTE ] Just to remind you it's perfectly legal for me to do this. [/ QUOTE ] That's the third time you've ignored me in 2 days. You're about as good at ignoring people as you were mod'ing.
|
|
#15
08-11-2005, 09:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positions of authority and being a \"good example\" (improved)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] leaders at all levels should lead by example. [/ QUOTE ] So you are saying an internet mod that admits to of smoked weed in the past should removed of his title? [/ QUOTE ] No because his position has nothing to do with following the drug laws. I guess I should admend to within the confines of his position. That is he should act as he expects those being led to act.
|
|
#16
08-11-2005, 09:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positions of authority and being a \"good example\" (improved) *DELE
[ QUOTE ]
Post deleted by wacki [/ QUOTE ] TOO LATE. PAY ME!
|
|
#17
08-11-2005, 10:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positions of authority and being a \"good example\" (improved)
I am in a position where I hire/fire, and this question really made me stop and think.
I don't think I would fire anyone for their non-job related activities, as long as it didn't impact their job (i.e. a DUI for one an employee that has to drive as part of his job). I would take into account any "controversial" non-job activities before I hired a person in any type of supervisory role.
|
|
#19
08-12-2005, 02:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positions of authority and being a \"good example\" (improved)
What's his net impact? Is the loss of the person's own productivity versus a less-than-perfect alternative enough to offset his negative impact on the productivity of others through his poor example?
|
|
#20
08-12-2005, 02:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Positions of authority and being a \"good example\" (improved) *DELE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Post deleted by wacki [/ QUOTE ] TOO LATE. PAY ME! [/ QUOTE ] stop being a dumbass, you know he isnt gonna pay when he types "you are ignoring this user" or clarifies that he's not paying for a certain reason. you even quoted his post in your other reply, removing any real claim you had to getting paid. catch him for real, sherlock. also the noob he replies to doesn't get the $, the person who catches him replying to the noob gets the $. so even if you bust him you're gonna make someone else some $.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
