60k checkup: PT screenshot

Topflight · #1 02-13-2005, 01:25 PM

Thoughts:

Apparently I suck pretty bad. It seems to me that TPTK might as well be the nut low, and if you flop a set or straight you've got about a 50% chance of it holding up.

Topflight · #2 02-13-2005, 01:26 PM

Are there any other things I should get a screen shot of. I could create an image of every hand I've played. I think I'm losing with stuff like KTo after 500 hands. Would that informatin be useful at all?

MAxx · #3 02-13-2005, 02:08 PM

that is pretty aggressive, hoss.

especially when you consider that you have your pf stats included in your total aggression factor.

IMO i dont think it is useful to include preflop in your agression factor.

i dont really have any great advice, but it looks like you are too aggressive to me.

your vpip is a tad low, and i dont think you defend your BB quite as much as you should. if you defended your bb a little more, your vpip would go up a tad

if i had to shootout a wild spectulation about your postflop play, i think that i would guess you overdue it on the "raise or fold" mantra... while most underdo it.

on the brightside 3,743 aint all bad.

Rubeskies · #4 02-13-2005, 02:17 PM

[ QUOTE ]
you are too aggressive

[/ QUOTE ]

Topflight · #5 02-13-2005, 02:27 PM

it's weird that I'm aggressive. I never feel aggressive. Should I be checking more turns instead of betting or something.

Could calling down checkraises affect my aggression?

I'd like to see these details from a 2/100 player. Why is that such a taboo thing? I'm surprised at the lack of screenshot and PT data sharing that goes on from the good players.

I don't think I'm three betting a lot. I think I just hit my top pair and bet flop bet turn bet river unless told otherwise.

Topflight · #6 02-13-2005, 02:29 PM

What are the benchmarks for folded sb and bb to steal?

J.R. · #7 02-13-2005, 06:57 PM

read some peter

balkii · #8 02-13-2005, 02:32 PM

I'm surprised at the lack of screenshot and PT data sharing that goes on from the good players.

I'm not. Talking about stats is pretty worthless most of the time. You apparently seem to think that stats are the means to the end of good play. Its quite the opposite though. The good players on this forum post hands, not stats.

MAxx · #9 02-13-2005, 02:35 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Could calling down checkraises affect my aggression?

[/ QUOTE ]

technically this would lower your aggression. i dont think this is the exact area i would focus on. however, if you are folding to turn c/r's way too often... then that is a leak.

for many pt screenshots are taboo, for many others they are not. whatever you wanna do, dude. for me personally, i like them if there are significant amount of hands.

there are tons of pt stat posts in here, i think it just so happens that people running badly happen to post them more often to people doing well.

Jeff W · #10 02-17-2005, 02:26 AM

[ QUOTE ]
it's weird that I'm aggressive. I never feel aggressive.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're the button in this hand.

Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (6 max, 6 handed) converter

Preflop:
UTG calls, MP raises, CO calls, Button 3-bets, 2 folds, UTG calls, MP caps, CO calls, Button calls, UTG calls.

Flop: (17.40 SB) 8c, Qh, Ts (4 players)
UTG checks, MP bets, CO calls, Button raises, UTG calls, MP 3-bets, CO calls, Button caps, UTG calls, MP calls, CO calls.

Turn: (16.70 BB) Jc (4 players)
UTG checks, MP checks, CO checks, Button bets, UTG calls, MP calls, CO folds.

River: (19.70 BB) Kh (3 players)
UTG checks, MP checks, Button bets, UTG calls, MP calls.

Final Pot: 22.70 BB
Main Pot: 22.70 BB, between MP, Button and UTG.

Results below:
<font color="white">
UTG has Tc 6d (one pair, tens).
MP has Qc Qs (three of a kind, queens).
Button has As Ah (straight, ace high).
Outcome: Button wins 22.70 BB.</font>