Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-18-2005, 09:30 AM
buddhablessed1 buddhablessed1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 13
Default time permitting, can a winning player never book a losing session?

say i make 5bb/100 playing online 3/6 after 10k hands with a standard deviation of 16bb/100. assuming my bankroll is unlimited and my play won't suffer from lack of sleep, about how many consecutive hours would it take for me to guarantee i never book a losing session? is this even a valid question?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-18-2005, 10:15 AM
mosdef mosdef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 168
Default Re: time permitting, can a winning player never book a losing session?

if you assume that, after several hands, your results can be approximated with a normal distrbution with mean 5BB/100 and standard deviation 16BB/100, then you will never have probability 0 of losing over any time frame. you'll have more success if you want to pick a threshold of n games where your prob of losing over n games is less than 10%, 5%, something like that. but it will never be 0.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-18-2005, 10:23 AM
buddhablessed1 buddhablessed1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 13
Default Re: time permitting, can a winning player never book a losing session?

makes sense, ty.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-18-2005, 03:34 PM
KenProspero KenProspero is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 123
Default Re: time permitting, can a winning player never book a losing session?

Winning players can have losing months or longer.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-18-2005, 08:10 PM
macdaddy991 macdaddy991 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: time permitting, can a winning player never book a losing session?

Isn't your entier life of poker just supposed to be one big session? In that case it would be either a winning one or a losing one.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-19-2005, 02:28 AM
Myst Myst is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: time permitting, can a winning player never book a losing session?

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't your entier life of poker just supposed to be one big session? In that case it would be either a winning one or a losing one.

[/ QUOTE ]

I concur.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-19-2005, 06:46 PM
Onaflag Onaflag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern California
Posts: 258
Default Re: time permitting, can a winning player never book a losing session?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Isn't your entier life of poker just supposed to be one big session? In that case it would be either a winning one or a losing one.

[/ QUOTE ]

I concur.

[/ QUOTE ]

That settles it. xBB/LT it is.

Reality can be so depressing and this forum keeps one's imagination in check.

Onaflag..........
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-21-2005, 02:51 PM
tylerdurden tylerdurden is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: actually pvn
Posts: 0
Default Re: time permitting, can a winning player never book a losing session?

[ QUOTE ]
say i make 5bb/100 playing online 3/6 after 10k hands with a standard deviation of 16bb/100. assuming my bankroll is unlimited and my play won't suffer from lack of sleep, about how many consecutive hours would it take for me to guarantee i never book a losing session? is this even a valid question?

[/ QUOTE ]

You can NEVER guarantee this. Even if you are a solidly winning player (i.e. you have a firm understanding of the game and are playing against donks), it is possible (though extremely unlikely) that you will get sucked out on every hand you ever play.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-21-2005, 06:06 PM
AaronBrown AaronBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 505
Default Re: time permitting, can a winning player never book a losing session?

I'd just add that there's about one chance in 1,000 a random individual is so psychotic, they cannot tell reality from fantasy. If you played 25,600 hands with an expected win rate of 5 BB/100 hands and a standard deviation of 16 BB/100 hands, there's only one chance in 3.5 million that you would be behind by the luck of the cards. So, as a Bayesian, you would have to prefer the hypothesis that you were crazy, and too crazy to know it. You'd also have to prefer hypotheses like (a) your win rate is not 5 BB/100 hands, (b) your standard deviation is not 16 BB/100 hands, (c) the hands are not independent, (d) you're being cheated. All of these are much more likely than a bad run of luck.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.