|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
This means I\'m running bad, right?
11K hands at 2/4 and my winrate is 0.3
My biggest winners, in terms of BB/100 AQs: 1.58 99: 1.55 TT: 1.50 QJs: 1.39 AA: 1.34 ATs: 1.13 KK: 1.1 This sucks, right? Comparison with top 7 hands after 22K at .5/1 AA: 3.33 KK: 2.85 QQ: 1.9 AJs: 1.19 KQs: 1.16 QJs: 1.00 JJ: 0.98 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This means I\'m running bad, right?
It might mean you're running bad. Or it might mean that you have a higher winrate at .5/1.
gm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This means I\'m running bad, right?
[ QUOTE ]
11K hands at 2/4 and my winrate is 0.3 My biggest winners, in terms of BB/100 AQs: 1.58 99: 1.55 TT: 1.50 QJs: 1.39 AA: 1.34 ATs: 1.13 KK: 1.1 This sucks, right? Comparison with top 7 hands after 22K at .5/1 AA: 3.33 KK: 2.85 QQ: 1.9 AJs: 1.19 KQs: 1.16 QJs: 1.00 JJ: 0.98 [/ QUOTE ] Also compare to these numbers from Pokerroom: AA 2.74 KK 1.86 QQ 1.26 JJ 0.82 TT 0.46 99 0.25 AQ s 0.59 AJ s 0.42 AT s 0.29 KQ s 0.36 QJ s 0.19 Of course, these are for an average (losing) player. AA and KK are such a big part of your winrate that if in a small sample you are doing significantly worse with these hands than you would expect to in the long run, it's probably gonna show. In a small sample (~3,500 hands), I'm currently losing w/ KK, so this alone could account for my mediocre WR in this sample. Besides, I prefer this to the alternative explanations.... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This means I\'m running bad, right?
[ QUOTE ]
AA and KK are such a big part of your winrate that if in a small sample you are doing significantly worse with these hands than you would expect to in the long run, it's probably gonna show. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I should clearly be averaging more than 1.3 BB with AA and 1.1 BB with KK. Not to mention that QQ and JJ are even farther down the list at 2/4... Ugh. |
|
|