Tracking results: ROI vs $/100 hands

[Paul2432]

ROI seems to be the most popular method for tracking results in the 1-table tournaments. Does anyone here also keep track of money won per 100 hands?

I think $/100 hands is really what we are all after. What I am driving at is that two players with the same ROI could have different $/100 hands if one of them busted out much faster when he did not make the money. The fast busting player would make more money because he could play more tournaments (assuming equal playing time for both).

Anyway I play the $100+9 STTs at Party. My results are probably not significant since I only started keeping track for the last 29 tournaments but here they are:

ROI=42%
$/100 hands=76

I would be curious to see the results of others. Does anyone here adopt a go for broke strategy because it will allow you to play more tournaments?

Thanks,
Paul