Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > The Stock Market
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-03-2005, 02:24 PM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 373
Default Re: Google.

[ QUOTE ]
I told my dad to buy it and he's f-ing thrilled!!! I'm really getting into stocks now. I plan on becoming a stock trader.

[/ QUOTE ]

What reasons did you give when you told your dad to buy it?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-03-2005, 05:06 PM
RYL RYL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 92
Default Re: Google.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I told my dad to buy it and he's f-ing thrilled!!! I'm really getting into stocks now. I plan on becoming a stock trader.

[/ QUOTE ]

What reasons did you give when you told your dad to buy it?

[/ QUOTE ]

Volume precedes movement and a plethora of other reasons; so much so I don't even want to go into details because I'm afraid my fingers are going to fall off my hands typing all the information.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-04-2005, 07:07 PM
Paluka Paluka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 373
Default Re: Google.

[ QUOTE ]
Volume precedes movement

[/ QUOTE ]

what on earth does this mean?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-05-2005, 02:57 AM
imported_ncray imported_ncray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 122
Default Re: Google.

A lot of trading activity (volume) comes before movement (the stock going up or down).
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-05-2005, 01:40 PM
michiganfan9 michiganfan9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 129
Default Re: Google.

Since i'm a long term investor i would probably disagree. others most likely will agree but its book value is no where near its trading value. Extremely overvalued in that sense and i think it'll level off after a few years. Wut do u guys think?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-05-2005, 02:48 PM
RedManPlus RedManPlus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 175
Default Re: Google.

The $300 price has no meaning.

GOOG is exactly like any stock...
That runs up from $20 to $30.

At $300 GOOG trades for about 40-45 times next years earnings...
Cheaper than EBAY or YHOO...
With MUCH more upside.

Why the upside?

It's something few people understand.

Google is not a "search company".

Google is a "custom-built supercomputer" with proprietary operating system...
With ** by far ** the world's cheapest storage and computer power...
That is being leveraged for profit by the smartest hackers in the world.

Go back and re-read the previous statement.
The key words are "cheapest" and "smartest hackers".

Click to Read "The Secret Source of Google's Power"

Click to Read "GooOS - The Google Operating System"

Google's long-term plan...
Is to take the desktop away from Windows and MSFT.

Someday soon...
Your average person will no longer need a computer, hard drive, Windows, MS Office, etc
Just a simple "browser appliance"...
That will log into Google's supercomputer...
Your mail, word processing, 90% of what you need...
Will be sitting there perfectly safe and sound.

Hardcore techies, business will still buy computers...
But not 6 billion average people.
GOOG will give them everything for FREE.

That's why GOOG may actually be worth $3000/share...
Because it's not about "search"...
They are engineering a historic "paradigm shift"...
In the way people interact with computers.

rm+

[img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-05-2005, 04:04 PM
James Boston James Boston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 314
Default Re: Google.

I'm not trying to give you a hard time, but you've got to get away from this book value thing. It's not that important of a figure.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-05-2005, 10:25 PM
michiganfan9 michiganfan9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 129
Default Re: Google.

The only reason why i mention it soo much is because i'm a follower of warren buffet. That's all
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-05-2005, 10:25 PM
michiganfan9 michiganfan9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 129
Default Re: Google.

It's all about long term investing for me cuz i'm 15
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-05-2005, 10:41 PM
James Boston James Boston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 314
Default Re: Google.

I think you're misunderstanding Buffett's methodology. I've read books about his investment approach too. I don't recall book value ever being mentioned. As I've said before, his approach to determining value is primarily centered aroung what he calls "owner earnings."

net income + depreciation - capital expenditures

this is also known as free cash flow

If picking good stocks were as simple as looking at 2 figures, the book value and the trading value, then you could teach anyone in under 2 minutes how to make as much money as Warren Buffett. You're over-simplifying it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.