Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-24-2004, 05:44 PM
GrinningBuddha GrinningBuddha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 562
Default It\'s good for poker, I suppose, but seriously...

The beats that are flying around at this year's World Series are fairly unbelievable. If I paid $2,000 or $5,000 or God forbid the full $10,000 to get in and met this fate (David Grindstaff):

Raise w/ JJ, short stack re-raises w/ K6s, flop comes K 6 3.
Later you're dealt QQ, push in and go down to K6o. I mean seriously, K6o? People are paying ridiculous amounts of chips to call terrible hands at this tournament. An unknown player raises w/ A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], is re-raised by K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], and then calls an all-in on the turn with the board reading 4 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. What the hell is THAT?

The pros must be licking their chops. Well, the ones that are left, anyway. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-24-2004, 06:02 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 4,044
Default Re: It\'s good for poker, I suppose, but seriously...

It seems that most posters here just don't understand that K6o isn't much of an underdog to QQ. The QQ player should expect to lose nearly one out of every three times. But, posters here seem to think the QQ is entitled to win 99% of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2004, 06:18 PM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cranston, RI
Posts: 4,011
Default Re: It\'s good for poker, I suppose, but seriously...

Agreed. They look at K6 and think it's trash, but in reality, hot and cold vs. QQ, K6 is virtually identical to AJ.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2004, 06:26 PM
B Dids B Dids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sea-town!!
Posts: 326
Default Re: It\'s good for poker, I suppose, but seriously...

While I understand your point- doesn't the fact that AJ can make a straight change the odds a bit?

As I mentioned in an earlier thread, it seems hard to be critical of play without seeing the play itself.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-24-2004, 06:35 PM
MarkD MarkD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 492
Default Re: It\'s good for poker, I suppose, but seriously...

Holdem Hi: 1712304 enumerated boards
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Qd Qh 1221087 71.31 485745 28.37 5472 0.32 0.715
Js Ac 485745 28.37 1221087 71.31 5472 0.32 0.285

Holdem Hi: 1712304 enumerated boards
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
Qd Qh 1224567 71.52 483043 28.21 4694 0.27 0.717
6s Kc 483043 28.21 1224567 71.52 4694 0.27 0.283

0.002 difference in EV between K6o and AJo vs QQ
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-24-2004, 06:36 PM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cranston, RI
Posts: 4,011
Default Re: It\'s good for poker, I suppose, but seriously...

Ran 'em on twodimes. QQ wins against AJo 71.32%, against K6 71.52%

The 2 str8 cards for AJ gets offset by the fact that 2 of the Q's needed for those str8's are already gone.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-25-2004, 12:00 AM
aaronjacobg aaronjacobg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 11
Default Re: It\'s good for poker, I suppose, but seriously...

The point here really is that reraising after a raise w/ K6o is incredibly dumb. I believe this player's thought process at the time was not "hmm, K6o is only a 3:1 dog to queens." I don't have the numbers but i'm pretty sure that AK vs. K6, a more likely type of hand is much more of a favorite. This guy obviously has no clue. He pushed in when he knew he was behind and not terribly short stacked. There is no strategy, just tuna.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-24-2004, 06:28 PM
slamdunkpro slamdunkpro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Springfield VA
Posts: 544
Default Re: It\'s good for poker, I suppose, but seriously...

[ QUOTE ]
It seems that most posters here just don't understand that K6o isn't much of an underdog to QQ.

[/ QUOTE ]

These are the same people who will 3 bet you pre-flop with 24o then look at their stack later and wonder "where did it go! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-24-2004, 06:54 PM
GrinningBuddha GrinningBuddha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 562
Default Re: It\'s good for poker, I suppose, but seriously...

I'm not astonished that QQ lost to K6. I'm astonished that someone would voluntarily put money into the pot at the World Series with it against a raise, regardless of the outcome.

In any event, David is going to have nightmares about K6 for a while...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-24-2004, 09:33 PM
jakethebake jakethebake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: It\'s good for poker, I suppose, but seriously...

yes, but that is assuming he knew he was up against QQ. He might as easily have been up against KK or AA. Dumb call.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.