Pot Odds/Effective Odds/Probability Question

[Dave H.]

I posted the following in the Poker Theory forum and was advised to post it here...

I have a thread in the Beginner’s section entitled “Yet Another Pot Odds Question” if anyone would care to refer to it. Mr. AngryCola (whose birthday is today!) has been trying very patiently to explain effective odds and I really thought it would be a great item for the Beginner’s forum. However, in his last post, he did indicate that someone else might need to get involved. I couldn’t think of anywhere else to go but the Poker Theory or Probability forums, so I will try my best to explain my problem and a couple of examples that we were discussing. If this post belongs elsewhere, please let me know. I DESPERATELY want to understand this. I should also mention that I have read and reread and reread (ad nauseam) the section in TOP about effective odds and I'm just not quite getting it.

Initially, with a four flush on the flop, I thought I needed pot odds of about 4:1 to call the next bet. I know that my odds of hitting the fifth flush card WITH TWO CARDS TO COME are about 2:1 so I couldn’t understand whether I needed 2 bets in the pot or 4 bets in the pot to make the call. The way I understand it, I only need 2 bets in the pot BECAUSE I KNOW I AM GOING TO SEE BOTH CARDS, i.e. I am going to the river for sure.

So the question I posed was: if I miss on the turn, do I then need 4 bets in the pot to all, or is it still 2 bets?

The answer I received, as I understood it, is that I need 2 bets, because (...this was the answer I received):
[ QUOTE ]



It's simply a matter of taking your odds for both streets combined, and therefore missing on the turn has no impact on the fact that you will make your flush by the river 1 out of 3 times. Think of the turn card and the river card as a combination. You are calling based on that combination, not the 2 halves of the combination. Get it? The point is your turn call isn't a seperate decision. It is a completion of your flop call. The money you put in on the turn should have already been factored in on the flop, when deciding whether you had odds to see both streets. just because you are throwing money in the pot on the turn does not mean that you are making an odds based decision at that point in time.



[/ QUOTE ]

I thought that the answer would be that I needed 2 bets to see the turn card but, if I missed, I would have to revert to 4 bets to see the river card.

So, given this answer, I tried to carry it further with this example, and I would like someone to PLEASE tell me where I’m going wrong, because it just doesn’t feel right! I’m trying to look at this strictly from a probability standpoint without regard to the texture of the game.

OK, let’s assume there are no cards on the board as yet and that I have been dealt a pocket pair. I know that I have about 4:1 odds to make a set or better by the river. Trying to follow the logic from the four flush above, that says to me that I simply need roughly 4 bets in the pot each time I bet to make my bet a profitable one. If that were the case, especially in microlimit games, it seems it would be a no brainer to bet or call to the river nearly every time I held a pocket pair. Again, that just doesn’t feel right.

Can someone please tell me what I am doing wrong?

Thank you in advance for your help!

[gaming_mouse]

I thought that the answer would be that I needed 2 bets to see the turn card but, if I missed, I would have to revert to 4 bets to see the river card.

You are correct and are doing nothing wrong. The quote in your post is making an astonishingly basic mistake. You should not ever listen to anything that person posts ever again.

Because of implied odds, it almost always makes sense to call a 4 flush down to the river except when you are heads up or when the board pairs and you have good reason to believe a full house is out. So just a general rule of thumb, prepare to call your 4-flushes down.

Also, as an aside (and I don't mean to be rude), you should not pepper your posts with unnecessary history and explanation. Just state the facts and ask your question. It's too hard (and boring) to read long posts.

HTH,
gm

[AngryCola]

An astonishngly basic mistake? I take offense given that your answer is definitely an astonishing common mistake. What you say about 2:1 on the flop and 4:1 on the turn is completely wrong. If you don't want to use effective odds, and just use 1 card odds, it would be 4:1 on the flop and 4:1 on the turn. He is asking about effective odds, please help him out as I am busy today.

Also your post seems to lack an understanding of what effective odds are. I am explaning to him his odds of hitting the flush on both streets. My recomendation is not that he should fold or anything of the like.

What you say makes no sense. You can't be getting 2:1 on the flop and 4:1 on the turn. That just doesn't make sense. You are getting 2:1 for the flop and the turn combined, which is pretty good (a strong draw) that you will almost always have odds to draw to.

4:1 to make it on the turn specifically, and 4:1 to make it on the river. 2:1 to make it by the turn or river. Please, try to at least deal with some of these problems, before going around telling someone the advice they are getting is wrong.

If you tell someone that they are getting 2:1 on the flop, and 4:1 on the turn, you would be very wrong. I'll let others on this forum elabortate. Please, anybody with a knowledge of effective odds (besides myself), help Dave out with his understanding of 2 cards to come odds. I have quoted Sklansky's descritiption of effective odds, and it doesn't quite seem to have sunk in with him. Any other way it could be explained to him, other than what I have tried would be appreciated.

Also, here is a repost of a quote from TOP, for those who are still a little fuzzy on what effective odds are:

"Figuring effective odds may sound complicated, but it is a simple matter of addition. You add all the calls you will have to make, assuming you play to the end, to determine the total amount you will lose if you don't make your hand. Then compare this figure to the total amount you should win if you do make the hand. This total is the money in the pot at the moment plus all future bets you can expect to win, excluding your own future bets. Thus, if there is $100 in the pot at the moment and three more $20 betting rounds, you are getting $160-to-$40. When you think your opponent won't call on the end if your card hits, your effective odds would be reduced to something like $140-$40. If, on early betting rounds, these odds are greater than your chances of making your hand, you are correct to see the hand through to the end. If they are not, you should fold."

[i]-David Sklansky pg.53 of The Theory of Poker[i]

[gaming_mouse]

What you say makes no sense. You can't be getting 2:1 on the flop and 4:1 on the turn. That just doesn't make sense.

You are getting 2:1 for the flop and the turn combined, which is pretty good (a strong draw) that you will almost always have odds to draw to.

Dave,

I truly apologize that you have had to read through so much about such a simple concept. Facts about probabilities:

1. On the flop, if you have a 4-flush, you are a 2:1 dog to make your flush by the river. This is simply a probability calculation and has nothing to do with your effective odds or any other kinds of odds. The CHANCE that another spade comes IN THE NEXT TWO CARDS is:

1 - (38/47)*(37/46)=.3498, about 35%, making a 2:1 dog.


2. If the turn card is a blank, the CHANCE that the RIVER CARD MAKES YOUR FLUSH is about 20% -- 9 spades left out of 46 cards total -- making you 4:1 dog against.

There is nothing paradoxical about these two facts. Once a blank hits on the turn, you have lost one of the chances that you had on the flop to complete, so your chances go down.

That said, the above two facts have nothing to do with your implied or effective odds. You cannot calculate these in general, because they depend highly on the number of players in the hand, how many raises you expect (if any), and the number of players you expect to stay in. For a specific situation, you can estimate them. But for flush draws you will rarely need to estimate them because you will almost always have correct effective odds to call. There are a few exceptions, which I noted in my original post.

gm

[Dave H.]

Thank you very much...what you said is how I understood it.

[AngryCola]

**DUPLICATE POST**

[AngryCola]

[ QUOTE ]
That said, the above two facts have nothing to do with your implied or effective odds. You cannot calculate these in general, because they depend highly on the number of players in the hand, how many raises you expect (if any), and the number of players you expect to stay in. For a specific situation, you can estimate them. But for flush draws you will rarely need to estimate them because you will almost always have correct effective odds to call. There are a few exceptions, which I noted in my original post.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the key right here, what gaming mouse and I are telling you is actually the same thing, can you see why? He is simply asserting that you cannot estimate the action on the turn, so effective odds become difficult and inaccurate to calculate. While I may disagree with this aspect, it is a fair point. This is the reason people tell you to go with your immediate pot odds. As I told Dave before in many postds, if that is what he would like to do then go for it! But, he was still confused about what effective odds ARE. This has been the point of further discussion. Not how useful effective odds are, but WHAT they are. Thanks, and sorry for the confusion. [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

[AngryCola]

[ QUOTE ]
1 - (38/47)*(37/46)=.3498, about 35%, making a 2:1 dog.


2. If the turn card is a blank, the CHANCE that the RIVER CARD MAKES YOUR FLUSH is about 20% -- 9 spades left out of 46 cards total -- making you 4:1 dog against.

[/ QUOTE ]

My only problem with this logic, is how it is presented. This could confuse dave, with the way he is thinking about it. Both facts are true, however.

Problem is, again, it's 2:1 by the river. While it's true you have missed one of your chances, that has nothing to do with 2 card combination odds and probabilities.
Last time I'll repeat this, i promise (i know mouse knows this):
It's 4.2:1 to make your flush on the turn.
It's 4.1:1 to make your flush on the river.
It's 1.9:1 to make your flush on the turn OR the river

When dealing with effective odds (as dave wanted to learn), you use the 2 card combination probabilities, and not individual street probabilities. Therefore, when you miss on the turn YOU DO NOT re-evaluate your chances, when using effective odds. You were always betting on the combination, not what would happen on individual streets.

I'm just saying you can't mix and match when explaining these things, as Dave is confused about when to use immediate pot odds and effective odds. I think for his sake (and mine), he would be better off using immediate pot odds. [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

[Dave H.]

HELP...PLEASE!!!!!
Obviously, this MUST be a difficult question. I don't want to cause problems; I just want an answer!!!

Thank you!

[AngryCola]

It really isn't a difficult question, which is why I'm beginning to get frustrated. It has been explained just about as well as it can be, but you still seem stuck on viewing each street individually. If you can't get your mind around this just yet, it's probably okay. In most small stakes ames , you have so much overlay it will rarely matter if you use 2 cards to come odds or single street odds.

So, unless someone can explain it in a better way than David Sklansky, or myself, you are just stuck having to try to figure out where your brain is getting blocked on this issue. But, dont fear! Until you have a firm grasp of effective odds, just use the 1 card odds, about 4:1 on the flop and the turn, in the case of the flush draw.

Again, I'm not sure it can be explained much better than how David Sklansky puts it. Your mindset of wanting to view each street seperately is what is keeping you from understanding this, IMHO. But, it's not as big of a deal as you may think at the levels you are playing at. I still believe you should pick up "Hold'em's Odds Book", by Mike Petriv. It should open your eyes a bit to the probability for all situations. It also has a detailed look at combinations, which are important in 2 cards to come odds. Good luck. [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]