Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-09-2002, 10:05 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default WSOP



There has been a lot of controversy on RGP about who is going to (or not) attend this years WSOP, and if they are whether they will be tipping the dealers, etc. I haven't seen anything on 2+2 yet, and I'm wondering what the concensus of opinions are over here. Besides all the "Becky" controversy, my concern now would be if they take in millions of dollars in entry fees, how secure do you all feel that the money will be distributed to the winners as opposed to going to bail out some other part of the financially troubled casino? Would you accept a check from them for $1,000,000? Also, many of the quality dealers who I know have said they will NOT be dealing it this year because of the expected shortage of tokes. Comments from any past/present participants?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-2002, 05:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WSOP



Here are my opinions on the points you raise.


Best wishes,

Mason


"There has been a lot of controversy on RGP about who is going to (or not) attend this years WSOP, and if they are whether they will be tipping the dealers, etc. I haven't seen anything on 2+2 yet, and I'm wondering what the concensus of opinions are over here."


The dealers did better at last years' WSOP then they ever did. It was the floor people who were unhappy. Of course these floor people don't mention anything about the money that players hand them personally. They just complain that Becky didn't give them enough. As to should you tip? given that they are taking 6 percent from each tournament, that should be plenty to cover the tips.


"Besides all the "Becky" controversy, my concern now would be if they take in millions of dollars in entry fees, how secure do you all feel that the money will be distributed to the winners as opposed to going to bail out some other part of the financially troubled casino?"


I really don't see this being a problem. If this happen it would create a gigantic scandal. I assume that the gaming comission would step in and make sure that everyone was paid properly.


"Would you accept a check from them for $1,000,000?"


You can always take cash. Walk across the srteet and deposit it at the Nugget. Then your money should be very safe.


"Also, many of the quality dealers who I know have said they will NOT be dealing it this year because of the expected shortage of tokes. Comments from any past/present participants?"


These tournaments are famous for lots of break-in type dealers who deal simply terrible. I don't see how this will impact dealer quality one bit.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-2002, 08:19 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Response to Mason



Mason, you wrote the below sentence...


"given that they are taking 6 percent from each tournament, that should be plenty to cover the tips."


From what I have read, NONE of the 6% is going towards tips of either dealers or floor. That is going strictly to Binions. Did I understand this wrong? Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-10-2002, 03:09 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Response to Mason



I actually don't know.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-10-2002, 03:53 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Response to Mason



That is how I understand the 6% vig (no part of it is being used as dealer tokes, its use is for administrative costs).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-10-2002, 10:08 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default you may be right, BUT



some folks do believe that tokes are covered in the 6%


here on 2+2, shortly after the 6% was made public,there was a post which compared this years total cost to that of last year.....concluded that this year is LESS! !


perhaps they have money problems, but seems foolish to even think they would fail to pay.....that would put them is REAL trouble
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-10-2002, 10:37 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Response to Mason



http://www.pokerworld.com/2002wsopschedule/


this clearly states 6% is for house only - leaving the dealers and tourney personnel out in the cold, and many of the players saying they will NOT toke on top of the 6%
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-10-2002, 10:47 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default a better link



http://www.binions.com/wsop/2002_schedule.html
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-12-2002, 05:15 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Horseshoe



Rest assured that Becky the Bi*** is making plenty of money and is in no financial trouble. She is just continuing her trend of screwing over the customer and removing any bit of value that the customer used to get when it was Benny or Jack's place. That place has almost no capital expense, has one of the lowest payrolls for a casino its size, still gets plenty of good sized action for being a total dump, etc. What would make you think they would go under? To put it in perspective, the Lady Luck a couple blocks away is struggling terribly, yet is still generating cash flow. That should tell you that no matter how much the gaming numbers downtown look bad, the businesses there are still winning more than they are losing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.