Hey, Mason Malmuth? BRING IT ON ! Right here, on this website!

Cyrus · #1 01-17-2005, 09:53 AM

Translation :

Hey, Mason Malmuth? GREAT JOB! Right here, on this website!

...Yes, that's what the brightest ever American President claims now that he meant. So I'm adopting the new, official version of it.

I'll let Dubya elaborate. Read on.

CNN Report : President acknowledges that "sometimes words have consequences"

<font color="white"> . </font>

Toro · #2 01-17-2005, 11:24 AM

Even his wife thinks he's a tool.

zaxx19 · #3 01-17-2005, 05:03 PM

Ya, your right. Too bad tens of millions of voters didnt agree....4 more yrs-4 more yrs-4 more yrs.

Seriously, though, if I thought more than half of Americans were complete morons, that the president was an evil imperialist puppet controlled by a cabal of evil corporate interests, that our country was being sucked into the next Vietnam,...etc etc Id probably exercise my right as a free person to leave the country. Whats funny is that so few Liberals are. Begs a question doesnt it....

arabie · #4 01-17-2005, 05:16 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Seriously, though, if I thought more than half of Americans were complete morons...

[/ QUOTE ]

Didn't Sklansky say 95% were morons? I think this is giving too many people undeserved credit. For every person in this world that you truly respect and think is very intellectual, how many do you think otherwise?
IMO, out of every 100 i meet, read or listen to, i definitely don't find 5 that i respect, let alone 50.

An example, for those who disregard religion as an intellecual endeavor, over 99% of americans believe in a god-fearing religion.

zaxx19 · #5 01-17-2005, 05:24 PM

He also said a typical MIT undergrad in Physics should be considered more intelligent than Bach. After such an acinine comment I pretty much took his takes on intelligence as campy dork humor and nothing more

Wake up CALL · #6 01-17-2005, 05:47 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Didn't Sklansky say 95% were morons?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think so but if he had he would have been incorrect. A moron is defined as having an IQ of between 50 and 69. Thus only about 10% of the earths population would truly qualify as a moron.

ThaSaltCracka · #7 01-17-2005, 06:10 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Didn't Sklansky say 95% were morons?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think so but if he had he would have been incorrect. A moron is defined as having an IQ of between 50 and 69. Thus only about 10% of the earths population would truly qualify as a moron.

[/ QUOTE ]nice.

Cyrus · #8 01-17-2005, 07:57 PM

[ QUOTE ]
4 more yrs-4 more yrs-4 more yrs.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you are trying to out-moron your President, forget it, he's a pro.

This is not about the election. It's over, he won it. This is simply about one more Dubya howler.

The man stepped in front of the TV mikes one year ago and challenged the Iraqi insurgents to "BRING IT ON!" A year later, with more than a thousand Yanks killed and an insurrection in full swing, the man should be apologizing -- for being arrogant and careless. He'd have won political brownie points, too, for that.

But, no, he chooses some pathetic misdirection: BRING IT ON means GREAT JOB.

MMMMMM · #9 01-17-2005, 10:24 PM

Bush probably would have done better to have spoken more softly and to have carried a bigger stick--and should long ago have thoroughly whacked Fallujah, Mosul, al-Sadr City, and most of the Sunni Triangle with it.

cardcounter0 · #10 01-17-2005, 10:31 PM

"But, no, he chooses some pathetic misdirection: BRING IT ON means GREAT JOB."

Since the American People have eaten, with big smiles on their faces, every lie and misdirection to come from this Administration why shouldn't Bush stay the course?

I'm surprised Bush even addressed the issue, must have been a slow day or something.