|
|
|
|
#1
10-11-2005, 11:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $55: Overpair in level 1
I am a fan of folding this preflop after the raise. Or raise instead of open limp.
Both of those lines I like better than the way you played it. Limp fold I like to do early to set up the limp/rr later. 
|
|
#3
10-12-2005, 02:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $55: Overpair in level 1
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I am a fan of folding this preflop after the raise. [/ QUOTE ] This has to be incredibly wrong. [/ QUOTE ] Oops! You have a leak... Yugoslav
|
|
#4
10-12-2005, 03:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $55: Overpair in level 1
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I am a fan of folding this preflop after the raise. [/ QUOTE ] This has to be incredibly wrong. [/ QUOTE ] Oops! You have a leak... Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] QFT And for what it's worth. If I happened to misclick and/or make a terrible play and see the flop after that raise, I'd still check/fold.
|
|
#5
10-12-2005, 03:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $55: Overpair in level 1
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I am a fan of folding this preflop after the raise. [/ QUOTE ] This has to be incredibly wrong. [/ QUOTE ] Oops! You have a leak... Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] QFT And for what it's worth. If I happened to misclick and/or make a terrible play and see the flop after that raise, I'd still check/fold. [/ QUOTE ] Care to elaborate?
|
|
#6
10-12-2005, 03:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $55: Overpair in level 1
Sure....
Folding Preflop: Even though I'm closing the action with this call, it is just too much to risk to hit a set right here, which is the ONLY way you will ever extract 1 more chip out of this pot. Combine that with the fact that after you limped UTG, there is a UTG+1 raise and then two MP calls, you are likely dominated anyways. Autofolding the Flop: You are beat here 55-60% (estimate) of the time. (99-AA)
|
|
#7
10-12-2005, 04:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $55: Overpair in level 1
You're right that you need to hit a set to win the pot. You are also right that you are likely dominated. Still an easy call though.
|
|
#8
10-12-2005, 04:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $55: Overpair in level 1
[ QUOTE ]
Folding Preflop: Even though I'm closing the action with this call, it is just too much to risk to hit a set right here, which is the ONLY way you will ever extract 1 more chip out of this pot. Combine that with the fact that after you limped UTG, there is a UTG+1 raise and then two MP calls, you are likely dominated anyways. [/ QUOTE ] Wouldn't you want to be up against a high PP overpair when you hit your set? The implied odds are there for a call. The only argument against calling is a stack retention argument, and I am not persuaded by such an argument in this case. (Edited so I sounded less patronizing.)
|
|
#9
10-12-2005, 04:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $55: Overpair in level 1
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I am a fan of folding this preflop after the raise. [/ QUOTE ] This has to be incredibly wrong. [/ QUOTE ] Oops! You have a leak... Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] Yugo, You are my boy, but folding 88 getting 5:1 for just over 5% of your stack in a multi way pot is a HUGE leak. Love, Beef
|
|
#10
10-12-2005, 06:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $55: Overpair in level 1
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I am a fan of folding this preflop after the raise. [/ QUOTE ] This has to be incredibly wrong. [/ QUOTE ] Oops! You have a leak... Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] Yugo, You are my boy, but folding 88 getting 5:1 for just over 5% of your stack in a multi way pot is a HUGE leak. Love, Beef [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, but we've been over this. Most players won't pull out enough $$ post flop with this hand here to make it worth it even though it's only 6% of your stack. BTW Deuce: What does QFT mean?!?! Yugoslav
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
