Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-27-2004, 11:52 PM
beernutz beernutz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: gulf coast
Posts: 908
Default Re: Seems like a lot of posters here work for the sites.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If someone disagrees with you then they work for the site?


[/ QUOTE ]

No Bob.

However, I am suspicious when someone responds with an insult and takes my comments about a site personally.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you have seriously underestimated the acrimony you have previously generated on this site.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-28-2004, 12:58 AM
gabyyyyy gabyyyyy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 730
Default Re: Seems like a lot of posters here work for the sites.

[ QUOTE ]
Most of the 2+2ers have just been posting that they feel your suggestions are a bit unwarranted. Possibly b/c they have had good luck at pokerstars or they just think your data is a tad slim and very inconclusive.


[/ QUOTE ]

Well I have been playing online since it's inception. My pokertracker file holds over 250,000 hands.

I realize that I am dealing with people who only think inside the box.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-28-2004, 06:33 AM
daveymck daveymck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 388
Default Re: Seems like a lot of posters here work for the sites.

You have played so much yet whined like a bitch when no $50 came from the last OIC with all them hands surely you have a huge bankroll.

Also after all them hnads you think stars have a switch that flags your account as a potential cash out and so makes the software weight the cards against you to benefit your opponants.

Face it you made a stupid comment people mocked you and you have been digging a deeper and deeper hole for yourself since.

If you really think its rigged and have evedence why not take it up with PWC or whoever does the auditing for the site and issues the certificate.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-28-2004, 07:03 AM
Gata Kamsky Gata Kamsky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 89
Default Re: Seems like a lot of posters here work for the sites.

I work for partypoker and I ASSURE U IT IS NOT RIGGED. The quads you see every hand is do to variance and the AA vs. KK vs. QQ vs. AK you see every 3rd hand is do to the amount of hands you see and the AA constantly losing to suited cards 50% of the time is normal since if you have more than 1 other person in the pot than AA won't hold up! Oh yah and the Ace on the river 40% of the time is just your mind playing tricks on you, pokertracker also does that sometimes!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-28-2004, 01:58 PM
Stew Stew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,360
Default Re: Seems like a lot of posters here work for the sites.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Most of the 2+2ers have just been posting that they feel your suggestions are a bit unwarranted. Possibly b/c they have had good luck at pokerstars or they just think your data is a tad slim and very inconclusive.


[/ QUOTE ]

Well I have been playing online since it's inception. My pokertracker file holds over 250,000 hands.

I realize that I am dealing with people who only think inside the box.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? how many databases do you have?

Just curious.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-28-2004, 02:04 PM
gabyyyyy gabyyyyy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 730
Default Re: Seems like a lot of posters here work for the sites.

Stew,

I have 5 databases. After about 50,000 hands it started getting really slow.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.