Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-24-2004, 01:51 AM
GrinningBuddha GrinningBuddha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 562
Default #1, #2 and now #10 from 2003 are out

Phil Ivey gets sent home when he makes a pair of Jacks to go with his AKo and his opponent (from Pokerstars apparently) shows him the other two. We'll definitely be getting a final table rewrite from last year!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-24-2004, 02:20 AM
The WET BEAVER The WET BEAVER is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: A BOOGA BOOGA
Posts: 220
Default Re: #1, #2 and now #10 from 2003 are out

stu unger won back to back WSOPs in the early 80's. he came back the following year and got knocked out the first day.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2004, 08:44 AM
BlackAces BlackAces is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12
Default Re: #1, #2 and now #10 from 2003 are out

That's just terrible poker. How do you bust on the first day holding nothing? Even if he's all in before the flop, he's going in on a coinflip.

"You can't win it on the first day, but you can sure lose it..."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2004, 10:57 AM
B Dids B Dids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sea-town!!
Posts: 326
Default Re: #1, #2 and now #10 from 2003 are out

A- AK isn't nothing.

B- Without being at the table, knowing the players, knowing what reads Phil thought he had, you just can't make this statement.

We're going to hear stuff like this all week aren't we?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-24-2004, 11:19 AM
BlackAces BlackAces is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 12
Default Re: #1, #2 and now #10 from 2003 are out

Read the DN thread. I wouldn't be surprised if Phil thought he could bluff some guy he's never met out of a big pot just because he's Phil Ivey.

And on a JJxxx board, AK is nothing -- nut no pair (well, one pair in this case).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-24-2004, 12:14 PM
B Dids B Dids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sea-town!!
Posts: 326
Default Re: #1, #2 and now #10 from 2003 are out

JJ is a lot if you don't put him on a Jack.

I'm pretty sure that it was JJ vs. AK before the flop then he flopped quads, but I could be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-24-2004, 01:19 PM
Michael Davis Michael Davis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 613
Default Re: #1, #2 and now #10 from 2003 are out

Clearly, this is an overgeneralized statement.

It is not bad poker if Ivey (as I suspect) was the one who moved all-in preflop. I seriously doubt he called off a bunch of chips with AKo.

I suggest it is his opponent who played worse if HE called off a bunch of chips with JJ.

I don't understand the irrational fear of being put out out on the first day. If Ivey and other like Juanda can accumulate a big stack on day one, they have excellent odds of finishing high in the money, as they are deadly when wielding these stacks. In a field of 2600, it is unquestionably worth it to gamble it up in situations like this, especially if you are the one putting pressure on your opponent. There is a big difference between pushing stacks around and intimidating your opponent and calling off significant chips in coin toss situations.

Besides, losing a coin toss with 2000 people left is better than with 500.

-Michael
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.