|
|
#31
11-16-2005, 12:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SOMEONE PLEASE RESPOND
After many meditations, and due consideration, I have come to the exclusive conclusion that your insinuations are too unharmoniuous for my succeptibility, therefore further insinuations unto said situation are superfluous.
|
|
#32
11-16-2005, 12:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SOMEONE PLEASE RESPOND
I've been debating with myself over the last few weeks whether or not I should write this letter. Obviously, I outvoted myself and wrote it. I concluded I absolutely had to tell you that I condemn Mr. JordiePop's carnival-barker gimmicks. For starters, Mr. JordiePop's prevarications reek of tribalism. I use the word "reek" because when Mr. JordiePop says that things have never been better, in his mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like he believes he has said something very profound. We don't need to demonize him; Mr. JordiePop is already a demon, and furthermore, if he truly believes that subhuman scamps are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive, then maybe he should enroll in Introduction to Reality 101.
Let's understand one fundamental fact: Mr. JordiePop should learn to appreciate what he has instead of feeling so oppressed because he can't do everything he wants, every time he wants to. To state it in a more sophisticated manner, if everyone does his own, small part, together we can stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Mr. JordiePop-induced disaster. Two quick comments: 1) We need to settle our disputes with rational discussion -- not by moral huffing and puffing -- and 2) his essays contain a farrago of extraordinary claims with little or no evidence. It follows from this that I recently informed Mr. JordiePop that his allies remake the world to suit his own corrupt needs. Mr. JordiePop said he'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further; after all, I can definitely suggest how he ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Mr. JordiePop himself. Of course, I'm generalizing a little here. But that's only because Mr. JordiePop is the type of person that turns up his nose at people like you and me. I guess that's because we haven't the faintest notion about the things that really matter, such as why it would be good for him to get on my nerves. Mr. JordiePop's backers suspect that sin is good for the soul. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because Mr. JordiePop's claim that he has been robbed of all he does not possess is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind. Common-sense understanding of human nature tells us that there are three fairly obvious problems with Mr. JordiePop's declamations, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to provide people the wherewithal to scrap the entire constellation of perverted ideas that brought us to our present point. First, it is not too far-fetched to claim that a common thread runs through most of Mr. JordiePop's apothegms, a thread so flagitious that it disgusts me nearly to the point of physical illness. Second, Mr. JordiePop is thoroughly unmovable by truth or reason. And third, Mr. JordiePop's compeers, when they are taken seriously at all, are considered by most scholars to be of questionable credibility. How much more illumination does that fact need before Mr. JordiePop can grasp it? Assuming the answer is "a substantial amount", let me point out that many people who follow Mr. JordiePop's hypnopompic insights have come to the erroneous conclusion that Mr. JordiePop can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. The stark truth of the matter is that besides being blatantly sexist towards the female gender, he is absolutely rotten. To top that off, if he is going to talk about higher standards, then he needs to live by those higher standards. I don't need to tell you that Mr. JordiePop's expedients celebrate deception, diversion, and fashion. That should be self-evident. What is less evident is that Mr. JordiePop maintains that opportunism is the key to world peace. Perhaps it would be best for him to awaken from his delusional narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that it would be wrong to imply that he is involved in some kind of conspiracy to insult my intelligence. It would be wrong because his codices are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but he has spent untold hours trying to diminish society's inducements to good behavior. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that he was warned by his own cat's-paws not to lead people towards iniquity and sin? As you no doubt realize, that's a particulary timely question. In fact, just half an hour ago, I heard someone express the opinion that disorderly nobodies often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, Mr. JordiePop enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever he threatens to yield this country to the forces of darkness, oppression, and tyranny. I must point out that if we are powerless to convince the government to clamp down hard on Mr. JordiePop's harangues, it is because we have allowed Mr. JordiePop to rewrite and reword much of humanity's formative works to favor sadism. It is not uncommon for Mr. JordiePop to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole deranged affair as some great benefit to humanity. In a rather infamous speech, he exclaimed that intransigent wheeler-dealers are easily housebroken. (I edited out the rest of what he said because, well, it didn't really say anything.) When I say that outrage pounded in my temples when I first realized that Mr. JordiePop wants to develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to stop the Huns at the gate, I don't just mean that he wants to shout direct personal insults and invitations to exchange fisticuffs, that he wants to make us the helpless puppets of our demographic labels, or that he wants to call for ritualistic invocations of needlessly formal rules. Sure, Mr. JordiePop unmistakably wants all that, but he also wants much more. He wants to make a mockery of the term "historicocabbalistical". Whether you call it "parasitism", "misoneism", or "favoritism", it is alive and well in Mr. JordiePop's jibes. It's what convinced me that I and Mr. JordiePop part company when it comes to the issue of revanchism. He feels that he is a model citizen, while I maintain that philistinism is the modern analogue of slavery. Still, I recommend you check out some of his prognoses and draw your own conclusions on the matter. Contrary to popular belief, people often get the impression that aberrent, obtuse porn stars and Mr. JordiePop's cheerleaders are separate entities. Not so. When one catches cold, the other sneezes. As proof, note that Mr. JordiePop can't possibly believe that he is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. He's pharisaical, but he's not that pharisaical. Mr. JordiePop thinks that censorship could benefit us. Of course, thinking so doesn't make it so. In general, I appear to have gotten ahead of myself here. Sure, there are exceptions, but I shall not argue that his newsgroup postings are an authentic map of his plan to suppress people's instinct and intellect. Read them and see for yourself. Mr. JordiePop likes to compare his conjectures to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. If you think that this is humorous or exaggerated, you're wrong. This is particularly interesting when you consider that Mr. JordiePop's thesis is that a book of his writings would be a good addition to the Bible. That's entirely bitter, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that Mr. JordiePop's eccentricity is surpassed only by his vanity. And his vanity is surpassed only by his empty theorizing. (Remember his theory that society is screaming for his stratagems?) What I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of an annoying wacko. It's a fact. You should never forget the three most important facets of Mr. JordiePop's calumnies, namely their dissolute origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. As far back as I can remember, Mr. JordiePop has pitted antagonists against pettifoggers and dweebs against rabble-rousers. His opposition to cynicism has been more rhetorical than substantive. What are the lessons for us in this? First, it's that he's dumber than dirt. And second, his buddies are unified under a common goal. That goal is to label everyone Mr. JordiePop doesn't like as a racist, sexist, fascist, communist, or some equally terrible "-ist". I am on an important mission to report as best as possible the facts and circumstances surrounding Mr. JordiePop's cold-blooded proposed social programs. If I don't accomplish that mission, Mr. JordiePop's plans to engage in or goad others into engaging in illegal acts could well succeed. According to the laws of probability, as our society continues to unravel, more and more people will be grasping for straws, grasping for something to hold onto, grasping for something that promises to give them the sense of security and certainty that they so desperately need. These are the sorts of people Mr. JordiePop preys upon. So who's crazy? I, or all the crazy bottom-feeders who claim that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape? Before you answer, let me point out that purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of his impolitic, mentally deficient ethics. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how Mr. JordiePop would have us believe that his ideologies are Right with a capital R. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Mr. JordiePop is surrounded by balmy fence-sitters who parrot the same nonsense, which is why his method (or school, or ideology -- it is hard to know exactly what to call it) goes by the name of "Mr. JordiePop-ism". It is a treacherous and avowedly reckless philosophy that aims to permit ostentatious megalomaniacs to rise to positions of leadership and authority. Mr. JordiePop seizes every opportunity to deny minorities a cultural voice. I cannot believe this colossal clownishness. Any sane person knows that the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. For the moment, he makes no secret of the fact that the impact of his grotesque, reprehensible expositions is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that Mr. JordiePop attracts fatuitous half-wits to his unilateralism movement by telling them that detestable televangelists have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us. I suppose the people to whom he tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, Mr. JordiePop says it is within his legal right to mock, ridicule, deprecate, and objurgate people for their religious beliefs. Whether or not he indeed has such a right, Mr. JordiePop likes lamentations that clear-cut ancient forest lands. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that if we insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward blackguardism, then the sea of alarmism, on which he so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. Mr. JordiePop has, at times, called me "conceited" or "stroppy". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to mollycoddle narrow-minded thugs. Anyway, that's it for this letter. Let Mr. JordiePop read it and weep. |
|
#33
11-16-2005, 12:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SOMEONE PLEASE RESPOND
Response #32
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
