Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-18-2001, 03:40 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: One Thing About Cockpit Access



Andy,


Did you check out 60 minutes last night? The segment on airport security was appalling.


Regards,


Rick
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-18-2001, 07:10 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: One Thing About Cockpit Access



>>Just read through the suggestions from the link, and one would hope many of them will be considered by the FAA and other appropriate government agencies.<<


You've hit on one of the major problems,


FAA = Analysis Paralysis.


I'm fairly certain that many of these suggestions have been proposed before. In fairness though something like the SAFE mode being described would take years to implement even without analyzing the change and it's effectiveness. Not saying it isn't a good idea though because it is technologically feasible.



Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-18-2001, 07:14 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Interesting



I would think that pilots would be reluctant to give up the capability to override the computers in SAFE mode. Could be wrong though as it will be interesting to read what you report back. SAFE mode is feasible technologically IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-18-2001, 07:20 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Security is going overboard



Regrettably I have to agree with much of what you write. It seems to be a bit of a dog and pony show. Why regrettably? Not because I wanted to disagree with you but I was hoping that something more substantive would take place. I think in time there will be substantive changes that are effective. Hopefully that time span isn't too long.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-18-2001, 09:12 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Security Revelation!!



Natedogg, where have you been? I'm going to nominate you for a sub-Cabinet post inflicting, err, initiating new measures for the traveling public.


"What about a really big man? Are we going to prevent big men from flying? All it takes is seven or eight very large muscled 250 pounders with the will to do so and the plane is theirs, with or without weapons."


Starting tomorrow, there will no longer be a check in for our flights; there will be a weigh in. Flights will be organized according the classes recognized by the staff of _Ring_ magazine. At the very top, above Heavyweight, we shall add a new super category called Suma Class, to hold Samoans and those NFL linemen who pose such an unnatural threat!


In the meantime, don't order fried liver in the concourse eatery: you'll never get through it with plastic cutlery.



Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-18-2001, 09:24 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Proper use of the club...



...could be part of the instructions we now get for the oxygen mask, emergency exits and flotation devices. I'm almost not being facetious. Democratic self-defense could have made a 6,000 life difference.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-18-2001, 09:33 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Politeness



Twenty years ago when I lived in Arizona, it was accepted as a statistical reality that one in four motor vehicles contained a firearm. I do believe that motor traffic was more civil. The only truly rude drivers, the ones who'd make that deliberately (the term "road rage" hadn't yet been coined) threatening lane change followed by a gesture were tourists who didn't appreciate the frontier environment.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-18-2001, 09:43 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default You Got SERVICE in Sun Valley? N/T *NM*




Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.