astroglide/ question for you

[PokerHorse]

First I tried to look up your results playing the 6 table/3/6 but you must be the most prolific poster on this site. I gave up.
I have a basic question. Obviously playing 6 tables you don't have much time to think. How much of the time did you find yourself playing your cards vs the situation as opposed to reading your opponents? Did you jus tassume they were weak because you were playing 3-6? or did you also track info on the players. Als o how long did you do this?

[Franchise (TTT)]

I don't know astroglide very well, but I'd be surprised if he continued humoring you after you all but covered your ears and started shouting "LALALA I DON'T BELIEVE ANYONE YOU'RE ALL BAD POKER PLAYERS" in the Books forum.

I think he gave you the stats to shut you up.

[razor]

You're too funny

Try reading your own 'Forward by Sklansky of SSH' thread.

You post this and in your very next post you piss on someone else for allegedly not reading the full thread... ironic, don't you think?

[MicroBob]

his stats are in the very thread that you started.

on my dial-up line it takes a little while for screen-shots such as astro's to fully load or show-up or whatever....so you may have to wait it out.
anyway, it's somewhere around page 7 or 8 or so.


not to speak for astro....but for my situation i just play the cards for the most part. there are a few players on each table who i will either recognize as a rock or a maniac (so i can either really respect their raise or i can re-raise to isolate the maniac).
and the pokertracker notes/stats export thing helps a lot too....but these games were beatable before that feature came along.

if someone caps PF with J6o i'll make a note on that player....but sometimes i'll miss it completely because i'm out of the hand and on a different table.

anyway, astro's stats are pretty impressive...but there are other players like me who can pull off 1-1.5BB/100 playing anywhere from 4 to 6 tables.
it really shouldn't be that tough at all to beat the 2/4 and 3/6 games for a measly 1BB/100.

to get to astro-like levels i'll certainly need to improve my game and his screen-shot stats will serve as a reasonable goal for me to try to attain in the next few months.

[pudley4]

[ QUOTE ]
but you must be the most prolific poster on this site.

[/ QUOTE ]

Obviously he's not, but the fact that you can't figure this out, coupled with the fact that you can't find his response in your original thread proves that you are the stupidest poster on this site.

Congratulations.

[bdk3clash]

[ QUOTE ]
Obviously he's not, but the fact that you can't figure this out, coupled with the fact that you can't find his response in your original thread proves that you are the stupidest poster on this site.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's close, but my vote goes to airpoaneman. I'm probably in the top ten or so.

[PokerHorse]

i dont know what your talking about. and either do you

[PokerHorse]

i hate to break it too you guys but there were quite a few posts in that thread .i tried to answer as many as poossible but I just didn't read them all the astroglide post I read didnt state that he posted them in the thread.

[razor]

yawn

[MicroBob]

he stated in the thread...'hey, i posted them....just look at all the pretty pics'
it shouldn't have been too hard to find or figure out.

since everyone in the thread was talking about his impressive numbers and asking how many tables he plays, etc it should have been self-evident.