|
|
#61
09-01-2005, 08:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How much does the increased rake at party effect us?
[ QUOTE ]
Rob, Are you playing 5/10 or 10/20? Also how much time do you spend at "full" tables? Brad [/ QUOTE ] I play 10/20, but this is from datamining 6-handed tables (hence the high averages). I usually play full tables as well, though I'm not adverse to shorter play if it comes to it. My average rake paid today over today was 2.31 with 5.26 average players, but I don't think my stats are going to be as accurate as overall datamined ones. Rob 
|
|
#64
09-01-2005, 08:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How much does the increased rake at party effect us?
I don't understand Shill... from the link it looks to me like all limits between 3/6 and 10/20 are raked exactly the same way.
|
|
#65
09-01-2005, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How much does the increased rake at party effect us?
[ QUOTE ]
I don't understand Shill... from the link it looks to me like all limits between 3/6 and 10/20 are raked exactly the same way. [/ QUOTE ] Read it carefully. They explicitly state there was a change in the 6m tables.
|
|
#66
09-01-2005, 09:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How much does the increased rake at party effect us?
[ QUOTE ]
It is only $60 for the rake jump though it will get hit less. [/ QUOTE ] Plus the extra $.50 at $50 pots won't be that rare at 5/10. This sucks. might be time to move back to full tables.
|
|
#67
09-01-2005, 09:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How much does the increased rake at party effect us?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't understand Shill... from the link it looks to me like all limits between 3/6 and 10/20 are raked exactly the same way. [/ QUOTE ] Read it carefully. They explicitly state there was a change in the 6m tables. [/ QUOTE ] when i finally meet you i am going to be disappointed you dont look like alizee.
|
|
#68
09-01-2005, 09:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How much does the increased rake at party effect us?
Ok I'll admit I'm confused.
The change, from what I understand at the moment, is that 6m tables now get raked just like any other table. There is one chart now for the rake schedule, and that is all. According to the chart, all tables regardless of type get raked exactly the same way between 3/6 and 10/20 with the exception of 2-3 handed games. So why would the rake/100 be higher at 3/6 than 10/20? Edit: I think I figured it out... can anyone summarize what the rake system was before for the various limits?
|
|
#69
09-01-2005, 09:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How much does the increased rake at party effect us?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I don't understand Shill... from the link it looks to me like all limits between 3/6 and 10/20 are raked exactly the same way. [/ QUOTE ] Read it carefully. They explicitly state there was a change in the 6m tables. [/ QUOTE ] when i finally meet you i am going to be disappointed you dont look like alizee. [/ QUOTE ] When are you moving out here?
|
|
#70
09-01-2005, 09:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How much does the increased rake at party effect us?
[ QUOTE ]
Ok I'll admit I'm confused. The change, from what I understand at the moment, is that 6m tables now get raked just like any other table. There is one chart now for the rake schedule, and that is all. [/ QUOTE ] The rake used to be capped at $2 for 6m tables; now full 6m tables are raked more. [ QUOTE ] According to the chart, all tables regardless of type get raked exactly the same way between 3/6 and 10/20 with the exception of 2-3 handed games. So why would the rake/100 be higher at 3/6 than 10/20? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure that it is. Intuitively there are two forces at conflict here. $1 is a larger fraction of a BB at 3/6 than at 10/20 but the pots at 3/6 reach $60 (where the rake is capped) less often than at 10/20.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
