Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Would you pay a fee to use 2+2
No 139 55.60%
Yes, a small fee 94 37.60%
Yes, anything I needed to pay 17 6.80%
Voters: 250. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 01-23-2005, 02:56 AM
apd138 apd138 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 43
Default Re: Some NFL polls on Brady, etc.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i am saying he stood out. esp. against the rams. that drive... oh baby.

[/ QUOTE ]

MVPs don't throw interceptions in the red zone in the 4th quarter leading 21-16.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd be willing to bet Montana did this more than once.

[/ QUOTE ] I think Montana has 11 TD's and no int in his 4 superbowls, im about 99% on this.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 01-23-2005, 03:04 AM
holeplug holeplug is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 112
Default Re: Some NFL polls on Brady, etc.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Untill Culpepper, Mcnabb, or Manning shows up for the biggest game of the year

[/ QUOTE ]

And by show up, you mean win?

It takes way more than the quarterback "showing up" for the team to win. For example, In the Seahawks loss to the rams, Hassellbeck threw a good pass with the game on the line and his reciever straight up dropped it. Had Brady thrown that pass and his reciever dropped it, would you say Brady didn't "show up" for the big game?

Another example:

Did Culpepper "not show up" last week? His defense didn't give him much help, and he was on the wrong end of a fumble into the endzone as well as a fumble that was not recovered due to Claiborne not re establishing himself in bounds. He also had an interception that was batted up in the air and came down in the hands of the D lineman. But I guess the team lost because Culepper didnt show up, huh?

[/ QUOTE ]

There was that 41 to 0 game a couple years ago too... And the Giants sure were a great team that year.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 01-23-2005, 03:18 AM
banditbdl banditbdl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 319
Default Re: Some NFL polls on Brady, etc.

[ QUOTE ]
Arizona should never have been in that game. Minnasota's offense should have blown out Arizona's d, which after several good weeks had managed to crawl up to something like 8th worst in the league.



[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure how many Vikings games you have watched the last few years but their coaching staff has an astounding ability to go extra conservative offensively on the road against shitty teams allowing the opponents to stay in the game and make fluky TDs like in that Arizona game. Daunte can't blow the Cardinals out by himself if his coaches are too chickenshit to let him.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 01-23-2005, 02:19 PM
Rick Diesel Rick Diesel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 90
Default Please clarify this

Am I starting a new team, in which I would MUCH rather have L.T. than Brady, or do I have the option of adding L.T. to the Patriots and removing Brady, in which case I would MUCH rather keep Brady because the Pats already have Dillon?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.