SNGPT says to push this

[Apathy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Does SNGPT consider the order of blind movement around the table and factor that into their stack equity? I didn't think it did but I could be wrong, that alone would easily be enough to make my point.

[/ QUOTE ]

huh? if shorty were utg right now (so bb next) then i'd agree, but here he's basically average in terms of paying blinds. i think it's the size rather than the location of the blinds.

[/ QUOTE ]

you're not getting it, it's more about his position relative to YOU and to the blinds, as in he will hit them first meaning that you should give yourself more equity then SNGPT says you have and and less then it says shorty has. I'm sorry if this isn't clear enough it's all in this thread to figure out.

[microbet]

[ QUOTE ]
Does SNGPT consider the order of blind movement around the table and factor that into their stack equity? I didn't think it did but I could be wrong, that alone would easily be enough to make my point.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't have a newer version of it, but I think the new version does do something about accounting for the position of the blinds.

edit: I would fold too (unless BB was way too tight). ICM also is not very good when anyone is near one big blind.